happysl.app
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.ca · 4 months ago

French nuclear attack submarine surfaces at Halifax, Nova Scotia, after Trump threatens to annex Canada (March 10)

lemmy.ca

message-square
118
link
fedilink
817

French nuclear attack submarine surfaces at Halifax, Nova Scotia, after Trump threatens to annex Canada (March 10)

lemmy.ca

Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.ca to Canada@lemmy.ca · 4 months ago
message-square
118
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • boke@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    221
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

    • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      90
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      You’re right, thanks for adding context. I’m immediately suspicious when a picture is posted with no accompanying news article, and my search wasn’t turning up any articles, only social media links.

      Here’s a French article about it.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      ·
      4 months ago

      Australia watching on with regret.

      • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        4 months ago

        Morrison is such a dickhead.

        • Gronk@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          ·
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          deleted by creator

          • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            I dunno … Dutton seems smarter, but more evil. Morrison just seems like a brainwashed idiot who’s failed upwards. I don’t know how anyone looks at the screaming void of evil that is Dutton and thinks “yeah that thing has my best interests at heart … or a heart”

            • Gronk@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              deleted by creator

          • Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’m still not entirely sure how Australia seemingly wound up with a modified Westminster system that was worse than the original, genuinely pretty impressive.

            • dellish@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              The only reason it’s worse is because we have a strong Murdoch media bias, so the general public are pretty ill-informed. With everyone being fed bullshit so often it’s easy to get them to vote against their best interests.

            • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              Arguably at least we have proportional representation. FPTP sucks.

              • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                4 months ago

                at least we have proportional representation

                Only in the Senate. And only on a per-state basis, so it’s only as proportional as “a proportion of 6” can be…which is much less proportional than a proportion of 40, like if the Senate were done nationally.

        • Hanrahan@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          We knew that BEFORE the election and yet elected the LNP anyway, fuck voters.

          • AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            4 months ago

            Could be worse, you could be a murican ᕕ( ᐛ )ᕗ

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        4 months ago

        right?! gawwwwwwd we’re so fucking captured

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      4 months ago

      Regardless, it’s presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

      Though I’d be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

    • yannic@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        IIRC only 2 out of the 9 french subs in service exclusively carry torpedoes and anti-ship missiles (Rubis class). I’m sure the 3 Suffren class with no second strike capabilities could still deliver some sort of short ranged tac nuke. So there are high chances that this is a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

    • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      They don’t need attack subs. They need boomer subs. At this point, Canada needs a nuclear deterrent. And I say that as an American who would be in the cross hairs of said nuclear deterrent. Canada should contract with the French for protection under their umbrella until they can build some of their own. The lesson of Ukraine should be that nukes protect small nations from fascist larger ones. Canada could easily end up like Ukraine. It’s not like fascists can’t find a casus belli. Putin was “restoring Russian glory” or some such. Trump would be “finishing the American Revolution” or some other bullshit.

      Please, Canada, from a friend of yours to the south, do not take this threat lightly. No one is going to be able to save you if the US decides to invade. The same oceans that protect you will prevent your rescue. The only hope Canada will ever have of being able to militarily protect its borders from the US is a credible nuclear deterrent.

      Just please, don’t harden your hearts while you build these weapons of destruction. Don’t close your doors to refugees from the US. As someone who is on the regime’s enemies list, hopping across the Canadian border and begging for asylum is the last chance I might have if things really go bad.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      Lamp Oil, Rope, Nuclear Subs? You want it? It’s yours, my friend. As looong as you have enough Euros.

      • aizakku@waterloolemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        Khajit has wares, if you have coin.

        • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      I mean, they’re not mutually exclusive. Nobody was about to start openly threatening the Americans, but having French forces around and mulling over defence deals with France sends a signal.

      We don’t know what Macron and Trudeau talked about, but accelerating things like this in light of the new reality could well have been part of it.

    • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also a great and well deserved middle finger to Australia

    • jimd@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      What’s the point of these submarines if there aren’t nukes on them?

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        There’s a dismantled trebuchet on board.

      • Alloi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        to demonstrate (politely) how quickly and quietly they can appear when we need them to. without endangering anyone or raising alarms that allow trump and co to rattle their sabers

      • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        To shoot at the ones with nukes on them?

      • Furbag@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I guess they could use them as a regular strategic missile platform.

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fake

  • ShakingMyCane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    France manages to get a sub to us before the UK even deigns to comment. That says it all. Merci beacoup!

    • JM⭐@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      56
      ·
      4 months ago

      Well done on falling for the propaganda

      • aizakku@waterloolemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        4 months ago

        Propaganda to do better for our country is needed at this point. Trade wars are a’comin, best to have a large movement to weather the storm.

        And unfortunately might only be a few winners, https://youtu.be/oYUI4hu950w

        • JM⭐@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          You are an idiot. The sub was scheduled for a visit,months in the making. There was no show of ‘force’. Maybe take your feet out of your mouth.

          • aizakku@waterloolemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            😘

  • myersguy@lemmy.simpl.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    ·
    4 months ago

    Bonjour!

    • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      121
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Hijacking the top comment to let people know this isn’t in response to any American threats, this is Naval Group, a French naval defense company, showing off their submarine because Canada is looking to spend 60 billion on twelve submarines. The plans for this purchase were publicly announced on July 10, 2024.

      Here’s a French news article about the submarine, seeing as I couldn’t seem to find any sources in English.

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        42
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’ll take both reasons as canon, thank you very much

        • Zagorath@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ll take both reasons as cannon, thank you very much

          FTFY

          • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            without cannons, how will they fight?!?

      • Zagorath@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        4 months ago

        Naval Group, a French naval defense company

        Ah shit, that’s the same company Australia had a deal with to buy diesel subs, before our fuckwit former PM reneged on the deal to create AUKUS and buy American nuclear subs.

      • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Weird that they specify “conventionally powered” in the Canadian article since this is a nuclear powered sub.

        • VeganCheesecake@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’m pretty sure that’s a Suffren class, and there’s both diesel and nuclear powered versions. Dunno how I’d tell from the outside, and don’t think the caption is necessarily all that trustworthy.

          • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Ah, that makes sense. It’s like when the car dealer shows you the version of the car you want with slightly different features since the one you want isn’t on the lot yet.

        • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I think it’s because many nations with subs have nuclear-powered vs diesel-powered. Diesel doesn’t have the vast capabilities to stay underwater for months like nuclear does.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          I don’t know if that’s a mistake. It might not be a nuclear sub, just a sub which has nuclear weapons capabilities ( though obviously not this particular sub because it’s still in the hands of a defence contractor ( I hope ) ).

          • evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s an attack sub (for attacking ships/other boats), not a boomer (which have nukes).

      • bettylaw@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I had real good tingle feels imagining France showing up on our coast during this part of history.
        A real “we got you bro” moment in my imagination.

        Le sad.

      • Camelbeard@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hijacking your commet to add this

        I don’t know much about this stuff, but I have been listening to a ton of podcasts about the war, geopoliticks etc.

        From what I learned, France and the UK have nukes, but not the type you can launch from a submarine. (Unfortunately)

  • CircaV@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    JT was just in France as one of his last acts as PM. Mere days later this bad boy shows up in a Halifax harbour. 🤔🤔🤔 Merci a la belle France 🇫🇷🤝🇨🇦

    • aizakku@waterloolemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      Vive la France!

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Jemepelle

  • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Could have imagined this happening as little as 3 years ago.

    An ally sending a nuclear deterrent into our waters as a message/warning to the US. This normally happens to countries like Iran or North Korea

    • Empricorn@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Hey. Guess what? At the moment, we’re the bad guys…

      • XenGi@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        At the moment? When was there ever a time the US weren’t the bad guys?

        • YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          28
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Briefly the us was the good guys when we killed a bunch of slavers and then when we killed a bunch of fascists. Those were exceptions to the rule though.

          • starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.mlBanned
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Removed by mod

            • Randomgal@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              ·
              4 months ago

              They also killed the Nazis, except for the ones that were useful, of course.

            • Zagorath@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 months ago

              They were clearly talking about the Union during the Civil War…

              • starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.mlBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Removed by mod

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  What’s the relevance of the founding fathers, then?

            • Retropunk64@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              deleted by creator

              • starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.mlBanned
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Removed by mod

                • Retropunk64@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  deleted by creator

        • socialjusticewizard@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          I kinda root for them in the war of independence

      • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yup

      • Mossheart@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      To be accurate, this is a nuclear propelled attack submarine. It does not carry nuclear warheads and is not what we normally call a “nuclear deterrent”.

      • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        It does not but can carry nuke tipped missiles and even though we have the screw signatures of our allies…this is still a message that the rest of the world except Moscow is looking down on us in disappointment

      • Empricorn@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I believe you, but do you have a source? That’s a pretty big distinction when *they’re calling it a “nuclear attack submarine”!

        EDIT: Clarification

        • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I used to look for submarines for a living. But you don’t have to believe me:

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_submarine

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_submarine

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ballistic_missile_submarine

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffren-class_submarine

          • Empricorn@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Thanks for the info. I’m curious if you have more details on what that job was (if you’re able to share)! Why did you move on from it?

            • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              My current job is to operate electronic sensors on board of an aircraft. I used to work with anti-submarine helicopters. The kind of helicopters that usually operate from a military ship. Now I’ve been moved to work on a search and rescue aircraft. It’s a nice change to be looking for people who actually want to be found.

              • Empricorn@feddit.nl
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                That’s cool…

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Still hasn’t happened. This was a sales pitch for a Canadian defence contract.

  • Grass@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    4 months ago

    nuclear subs always give me gundam carrier ship vibes

  • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Would a french submarine wear its hat like this:

    or like this:

    • gibmiser@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      4 months ago

      Asking the real questions

    • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      The top one looks like he got hit on the head.

    • Wren@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Holy shit I laughed out loud…

    • threelonmusketeers@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      This deserves its own post in [email protected].

  • Sunshine (she/her)@lemmy.caOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 months ago

    Let’s go! France is here to protect Canada!

    • Typotyper@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      4 months ago

      Na, they’re just finishing the 7years war-round 2

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      Idk about that. Other commenters have better explanations that aren’t sensational.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HM-E2H1ChJM

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    4 months ago

    Never have I been more pleased to see a foreign navies nuclear attack sub in my nations waters.

    (odd times)

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Removed by mod

    • qprimed@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      4 months ago

      perchance, banana for scale?

      • TachyonTele@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s a football field, Micheal. How big could it be, a banana?

      • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        It’s there, but hard to see.

      • Tylerdurdon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Whollottabanana!

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      The previously-mentioned French article says it’s a Barracuda, but I don’t know if that’s a model or a class.

      And unsurprisingly, he also decided to offer the Royal Canadian Navy its “premium” model, the Barracuda, rather than the Scorpène.

      • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Removed by mod

    • Albbi@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Canadian football fields are 100m, so just the right size for us!

      • Troy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        CFL fields are 110 yards, which is about 100m. Close enough I guess :)

  • 0ndead@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Bring it” - France probably

    • starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.mlBanned
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Removed by mod

      • Lemminary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        But I’m le tired…

        • starshipHighwayman69@lemmy.mlBanned
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Removed by mod

  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Important note: The “Nuclear” in “Nuclear attack submarine” means that it is powered by a nuclear reactor. It does not refer to its armament. An “attack” submarine means it is designed to attack ships and other submarines and these are typically not capable of carrying and launching ICBMs. Nuclear-armed deterrent submarines are called Ballistic Missile Submarines.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Don’t forget all the cruise missiles - it’s not just for attacking things at sea.

  • Hux@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 months ago

    Don’t tease me!

    NOBODY backs an American Revolution like the French!

    🇫🇷🦅🎆

    • 60d@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      Fake

  • peteyestee@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Fuck yeah.

  • Ceedoestrees@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 months ago

    Finally. Letting the French keep a little bit of Canada pays off.

    • beejboytyson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Pointing “am I a joke to you?”

Canada@lemmy.ca

canada@lemmy.ca

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: [email protected]

What’s going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta
  • Main
  • Lemmy.ca Support
  • Community Requests

🗺️ Provinces / Territories
  • Alberta
  • British Columbia
  • Manitoba
  • New Brunswick
  • Newfoundland and Labrador
  • Northwest Territories
  • Nova Scotia
  • Nunavut
  • Ontario
  • Prince Edward Island
  • Quebec
  • Saskatchewan
  • Yukon

🏙️ Cities / Local Communities
  • Calgary (AB)
  • Edmonton (AB)
  • Greater Sudbury (ON)
  • Guelph (ON)
  • Halifax (NS)
  • Hamilton (ON)
  • Kootenays (BC)
  • London (ON)
  • Mississauga (ON)
  • Montreal (QC)
  • Nanaimo (BC)
  • Oceanside (BC)
  • Ottawa (ON)
  • Port Alberni (BC)
  • Regina (SK)
  • Saskatoon (SK)
  • Thunder Bay (ON)
  • Toronto (ON)
    • Toronto Cycling
  • Vancouver (BC)
  • Vancouver Island (BC)
  • Victoria (BC)
  • Waterloo (ON)
  • Windsor (ON)
  • Winnipeg (MB)

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 Sports

Hockey

  • Main: c/Hockey
    • list of all Teams
  • Calgary Flames
  • Edmonton Oilers
  • Montréal Canadiens
  • Ottawa Senators
  • Toronto Maple Leafs
  • Vancouver Canucks
  • Winnipeg Jets

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

  • Toronto Blue Jays

Basketball

  • Toronto Raptors

Soccer

  • Main: /c/CanadaSoccer
  • Toronto FC

💻 Schools / Universities
  • BC | UBC (U of British Columbia)
  • BC | SFU (Simon Fraser U)
  • BC | VIU (Vancouver Island U)
  • BC | TWU (Trinity Western U)
  • ON | UofT (U of Toronto)
  • ON | UWO (U of Western Ontario)
  • ON | UWaterloo (U of Waterloo)
  • ON | UofG (U of Guelph)
  • ON | OTU (Ontario Tech U)
  • QC | McGill (McGill U)

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales
  • Personal Finance Canada
  • BAPCSalesCanada
  • Canadian Investor
  • Buy Canadian
  • Quebec Finance
  • Churning Canada

🗣️ Politics
  • General:
    • Canada Politics
    • FairVote Canada
  • Federal Parties (alphabetical):
    • Animal Protection Party of Canada
    • NDP
  • By Province (alphabetical):
    • BC Greens

🍁 Social / Culture
  • Ask a Canadian
  • First Nations
  • First Nations Languages
  • Indigenous
  • Inuit

Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 339 users / day
  • 238 users / week
  • 2.21K users / month
  • 11K users / 6 months
  • 0 local subscribers
  • 8.82K subscribers
  • 7.05K Posts
  • 70K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Otter@lemmy.ca
  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org