• Emerald@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    So nobody is going to talk about how he said “without the intent to fertilize an embryo” and not “fertilize an egg”? You can’t fertilize an embryo lmao

  • nekbardrun@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    In this thread:

    A lot of men who didn’t read the article and didn’t got the satirical part of the act.

    And given the last political polemic, I’m pretty sure these “men” are misrepresenting the article on purpose.

  • _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    I want to believe this is a satirical bill meant to bring attention to how absurd a lot of other bills are, but it is Mississippi. And with how things are going these past several years, it’s becoming harder and harder to tell at face value if something is an Onion or not.

    • Lesrid@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Here’s to the land you’ve torn out the heart of/

      Mississippi find yourself another country to be part of/

  • MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.

    Then you have the wrong job as a representative.

    • endeavor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      I’d say he is perfect for the role and he is sure to raise through the ranks of american politics at a rapid pace.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

      The article is very short.

      • werefreeatlast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        My article is 12 inches and very girthy actually, thank you! There used to be a surgeon in California to help you all with short articles. Sadly, you know, the fires…

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Short article, yet you failed to include the third that makes it illegal to jerk it:

        “As written by Sen. Bradford Blackmon, the bill would make it “unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material without the intent to fertilize an embryo.””

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Controlling how adult people practice sex now, eh. Boy, I sure hope all these Trump voters are very happy now.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        O… kay. Was I correct? I tried interpreting the rules listed in the link and drew a conclusion about what they’re trying to achieve. 🤷‍♂️ Thanks for trying to help, good buddy.

  • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    147
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    To highlight how absolutely stupid this bill is, it sounds like it would outlaw menstruation and nocturnal emissions.

    Land of the free.

    Edit: it sounds like this is intentionally facetious to point out the absurdity of other pro-life bills.

  • djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    126
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    If the Democrats aren’t going to be useful, I’m glad they’ve at least decided to be a little funny.

    • Hominy_Hank@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s a race to the bottom now. And the Republicans have a huge head start. Dems are nosediving to catch up.

  • snooggums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    I didn’t see the party of the politician in the article, so no idea if it is written in jest or just regular old Republican whackiness.

    The most entertaining part is that it is written as applying to men, but as written it is gender neutral and would penalize menstruation.

    Edit: It is a Dem having a lark.

    • thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 days ago

      i’m afraid that the fascists would take the bill up and actually vote to ban masturbation. especially the bible thumpers.

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        There are a number of active laws that were rendered unconstitutional by Lawrence v. Texas. In addition to the anti-sodomy laws, this invalidated most laws restricting sex toys.

        Lawrence was explicitly called out as being on the chopping block in the Jackson decision, so these are slated for a comeback. The only real limitation is that SCOTUS needs a case, and the challenger needs to show standing.

        Edit: fixed autocorrect

  • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 days ago

    Sure, some may say it’s absurd, but masturbation inspector is a good paying, high quality American job that cannot be exported overseas, and not a job I’d trust to AI.

    That state senator is a visionary!

  • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    It shall be unlawful for a person to discharge genetic material

    Genetic Material is DNA. Dry skin falling off is technically discharging genetic material. As is bleeding…

    Technically a woman would be grossly violating this with every period… or by giving birth.

    • MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 days ago

      In a statement to WLBT News, Blackmon wrote, “All across the country, especially here in Mississippi, the vast majority of bills relating to contraception and/or abortion focus on the woman’s role when men are fifty percent of the equation.

      This bill highlights that fact and brings the man’s role into the conversation. People can get up in arms and call it absurd but I can’t say that bothers me.”

      Did you miss this?