If they win, yes it does. But at that point, an opening in the Senate is the least of your concerns…

There’s an interesting theory that Hitler was put in place by time travelers as the last-bad option that wouldn’t destroy the timeline.

Hitler (and Trump) made a number of blundering errors that any idiot should’ve/known better than to make. Had a competent, or even a supervillain-type been in charge, things could’ve turned out even worse than they did. You don’t have to look far- some of these villains attach themselves to those in power. Himmler and Heydrich would’ve been far worse for the world, but were somewhat limited by not being the ones directly in power.

This does exist on certain vehicles, like ambulances.

But I’ve heard (unconfirmed) that it would be illegal in several states to put on passenger vehicles.

While I would generally agree with that statement (and gave you an up vote for it), I feel like Musk twisted that away from any normal business move.

For instance, many customers aren’t paying for premium features. Rather, they were extorted into paying, because their professional lives depend on it.

And even after all that, it’s not like it’s catering to users on any level. No one is saying that Twitter is better now. Well, no one except the Russian bots and the Nazis.

When a business blames its customers for choosing to no longer be its customers, it’s a sure sign the business is declining. Depending on the severity, it’s often a sign the business is failing.

This applies here, as well as any time you see an article that millennials are killing <business/industry/etc>. It also applies when an entertainer blames their (potential) audience for not enjoying their work. See Jerry Seinfeld, Kid Rock, etc.

No one owes your business any patronage.

This isn’t true, at least in the US. The vast majority of dog food is safe for human consumption, albeit not recommended.

The surprise shouldn’t be that you’re about to propose. The surprise should be in how you choose to propose.

Unless the ring’s details are part of the surprise (which they could be, if it’s meaningful to the couple), clear and open communication should be preferred

A much better question is why does the government (by way of its appointed monitor) think they have a say on the matter? IANAL, but this seems like a pretty clear violation of the first amendment right to free speech. This is especially true as a result of Citizens United, as bad as the ruling was.

Vegetarian can be cheaper, but isn’t a guarantee. If you are eating processed foods like single serving meals, the vegetarian options are often more expensive for the same quality.

Cooking yourself, from scratch, would save a lot more money. Plus it actually is cheaper to use veggies.

Looking forward to seeing this on Technology Connections. Seems right up his alley.

But knowing his timeframe of products, it’ll probably be 20 years from now…

They are allowed to run, because there’s no law stopping them.

As for why they have a chance at winning, I don’t think I can answer that without significant bias.

Just for additional context, this is not a recent development. It was designed in 2010, with a model exhibited in 2011.

Ref: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euthanasia_Coaster

The main problem with this is that there’s literally zero way to prove this, one way or the other. There are no logs with that level of detail, nor is there a (usable) timestamp of the observed infraction.

The best you could do is show that you did not send a text message, or a Facebook post, etc. Not only does this fail any chain of custody concerns (since you can’t get a certified copy from an independent party), it’s also trying to (impossibly) prove a negative.

Even if you could, that’s still not good enough. You have to show, conclusively, that you were doing something explicitly allowed.

Go ahead and try to show that you even skipped a song in your preferred music player, let alone when.

It wasn’t that long ago that Ohio was a clear swing state. While Republicans have always had an edge, it was not uncommon to see various offices/etc flip blue. While this alone won’t bring those days back, it’s also not an impossible task.

Then why do you need to tolerate it better?

There’s something missing in this ask. If you don’t handle a food very well, you simply avoid/reduce it. Whether it’s caffeine, an allergy, or whatever.

Why do you need to change your body’s reaction? Why not just switch to decaf or other drinks?

It does if you have career progression and promotions in mind. Also if you’re looking for some new insights to shake things up.

Cutting the power for 30 seconds drains capacitors. The most likely culprit is in the PSU, but I’ve also seen it be the motherboard or GPU.

Desktop PSUs have been pretty standardized for 25 years. The odds are pretty good that you still have an old one, or know someone that you could borrow from long enough to test.

Failing that, just get one from a place with a decent return policy. I like Micro Center, if you’re near one of those.

Other people have suggested the broader ideas of saving, but I’m going to get into the details of how to spend less money.

I follow the PERK system, and have found it to be very helpful. It takes a lot of effort initially, but becomes easy once you get to a routine. There are a bunch of explanations on this, so here is the first one from Google:

https://lifehacker.com/give-your-budget-a-tune-up-with-the-perk-method-1748020270

(To find others, I had to search for “Perk postpone eliminate reduce keep”)

Most people are on multiple platforms. Find them now, while you still can. Save whatever contact info you can for them. You don’t know when you’ll need it, nor why.

Well yeah, where else would you eat salad? The floor? Everyone knows that’s where burgers are served.