• stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s still technically called Indian Country and there are a variety of Indian services type organizations in the government.

    • BougieBirdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      9 hours ago

      My native american father in law prefers to call himself an Indian.

      From his point of view he wouldn’t call himself a “native american” because he belongs to an actual nation and indigenous people aren’t a homogenous group.

      He prefers Indian because it makes white people look bad. Incredibly based

      • AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        A sentiment I’ve heard a bunch is “oh, so you called us Indians and now you’re uncomfortable with that label? Well fuck you, you don’t get to keep unilaterally changing what’s acceptable. If thinking about colonialism makes you uncomfortable, then great! Start sitting with that discomfort and recognising the crumb of self determination that we express by identifying as Indians. You gave us that label, and it’s ours now.”

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        He prefers Indian because it makes white people look bad.

        I know nothing else about him, but I like him already.

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I was reading it and genuinely thought it meant South Asian Indian at first

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Depends on your country. Really every place has come up with something different: First Nations, indigenous, native, etc.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        8 hours ago

        “Indigenous” seems to be acceptable most people. When you know them personally, use their nation or tribal affiliation. Like if your friend was Korean, and you only referred to them as “Asian,” it might feel like you don’t care about the difference.

      • gbuttersnaps@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Different people prefer different nomenclature, but the generally accepted standard has switched from native American a couple decades ago to American Indian now. IIRC the change happened because calling people natives sometimes seems synonymous with calling them primitive. Most US tribal groups use American Indian now

      • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        20 years ago it was “native, aboriginal, or first nation’s” people

        Not sure which is the current flavour

  • lohky@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    205
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    15 hours ago

    That’s not weird. That’s how functional societies reconcile when they aren’t subjected to endless propaganda and fear mongering.

  • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    119
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Migration leading to mixed cultures instead of genocide and colonization. Americans: “This is so weird!”

    • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 hours ago

      “In this here melting pot, we burn away all our differences until we’re left with only the pure white flame of Christian nationalism.”

      I had to put the statement in quotes because while being hyperbole, it’s not too far from how some people think, and I don’t want to be confused with those folks.

  • m0darn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I don’t think jewelry wearing is compatible with the Amish conception of propriety and modesty but I’m not going to say it wouldn’t happen.

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      11 hours ago

      The “rules” the Amish live by are determined by the Elders of that group. They can be quite strict or fairly loose. And can vary by a fair bit from colony to colony even as neighbors. Cell phones can be fine for one group and be forbidden for the next.

      Like some much in life, the rules are open to interpretation.

      • MutilationWave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I saw some Amish or similar community teens freaking out in a Sheetz over the touch screens. They were having so much fun.

      • m0darn@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Right I get that, but the underlying value that the prohibitions are designed around is promoting humility and preventing vanity.

        • medgremlin@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          If the jewelery was given as a gift in good will, it would be worse to reject it or to accept it and never use it.

    • Fosheze@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      16 hours ago

      My grandpa rents some of his fields out to an amish guy who also rents a lot of other fields in the area. The amish in our area are known to be pretty loose with their rules so my grandpa wasn’t surprised when the guy showed up with combine harvester but he was kind of surprised with how new it was. My grandpa asked him how he could drive a combine when they weren’t allowed to drive cars. To which the amish guy responded, “Well, I don’t actually drive the combine; it drives itself. I just sit in it.”

    • jqubed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Maybe it depends on the branch of Amish. I’ve heard the ones in the Midwest are a little more relaxed than the ones in Pennsylvania.

      • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The Amish around where I live (Midwest) run a bunch of great little stores (which is most of the contact I have with them personally, but my partners mom has friends in their community who come to visit now and then.) The stores all take credit cards and have refrigerators for the cheeses/dairy, and many of them do use machinery for farm work. Some even use cell phones.

        I haven’t noticed any jewelry (haven’t paid attention), but they really do seem to pick and choose which portions to adhere strongly to.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My understanding is the faith has exclusions to the rules for when its necessary for work, so an Amish IT Administrator wouldn’t be impossible!

          • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            That does, honestly, seem to be the threshold for the communities around me.

            Can they use it in a way they can argue complied with their religion? If yes, and money, do thing. If yes, no money, do thing. If no, but money, try harder to argue, then do thing.

            If no and no money, leave the community.

            • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              2 hours ago

              Yeah the more I’ve found out and paid attention over the past few decades. I think the Amish how they were originally envisioned, died out many many years ago.

              The current ilk, use that perception to make money and at best give lip service to the original ideals.

              I figure in 50 years Amish will be indistinguishable from any other modern religion.

              • SolarMonkey@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 hours ago

                I mean even now they are just another niche religious community… I get what they were going for, but…

                Their communities have a lot of problems. Like a lot. And because they mostly have that year of going into the world (intended as a culture shock, but really is just an introduction to modern convenience technology, which is mmmmm so enticing) their numbers are dwindling. And that sucks for the culture loss, but I doubt they will even exist in 50 years, honestly.

                Or say they do exist in 50 years… they will be the people buying all the cheap shit that doesn’t meet emission regulations because they “have to weigh each new innovation”.

                For as long as I’ve lived in close proximity to Amish communities (most of my life, again Midwest), they have always made weird questionable allowances that I don’t really understand because I’m not part of the community. Most of them get around their religious limitation by just hiring someone, that’s why they need money. I know this because my family was hired on multiple occasions (because we often did poultry trades and other livestock deals with them) to operate machinery (chainsaws, modern farm equipment, etc) on their behalf.

                And doesn’t that just seem like modernizing with more steps?

                • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  46 minutes ago

                  Also inbreeding is a huge issue, I know back in the nineties there was a big deal about the large communities (Midwest, PA, NC?) intermarrying to try and help the issues

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Also worth noting often if you see what looks like Amish folks driving a car, especially if its for personal errands they’re often not Amish but Mennonite.

        I very consistently manage to shop at the same time as one Mennonite family, so I’ll see them getting groceries then load up their car and drive home

    • bluewing@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      As a father who raised 4 daughters, you try and stop a young woman from wearing jewelry, perfumes, and even makeup. That’s a fight you WILL lose every time.

      You should see the dating scene. A young Amish boy holding hands with a young Native walking down a hallway, (or vice versa). It ain’t right I tell you.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I learned very quickly I had already lost on the makeup battle by the time my daughter was 2. I thought maybe we could make it until she was a teenager but NOPE