I don’t know 'bout y’all, but I get them woody fibers between my teeth.

He was American, they don’t require gun proficiency to buy a gun, as a consequence few knows how to actually hit stuff or how to maintain their guns.

Take bump stocks, the rednecks are so obsessed with full auto that they ignore that you don’t hit squad with ordinary full auto and then introduce an unstable stock.

I’m not a good shot, but 400’ is what? 120-130m? Shooting a diemaco c7 prone, even I will hit +9/10 when firing at center mass with iron sights at that distance. How do you miss that shot thrice?

how were the secret service not on the roofs or monitoring the roofs from aerial POV? Most obvious spot for a sniper.

How do you know they weren’t and just missed it?

the dude interviewed by British journalist right after that says him and group saw man with gun climbing roof, told cops and secret service and neither did anything

Did you see the photo of the guy? A neck beard with a MAGA sun visor. If he comes to the police saying he saw a guy with a riffle on the roof, what will the likely conclusion be? that’s a secret service agent, that’s what it will be.

his first and only focus was his shoes?

Your point being?

a man who is a documented coward and narcissist pushed against secret service to face cameras and have his head exposed for a long period of time?

He’s also an idiot, so…

secret service ignores protocol to cover and remove him and let’s him vamp and pose

Same as with several of the previous points, incompetence more than accurately explains it.

straight lines of blood on his face, history with pro wrestling

Same as with shoes, what’s your point?

yes, the supposed gunman was killed, but on what day are there not thousands of trump cultists lined up and ready to die if someone tells them they are on a secret mission to help daddy?

The wannabe assassin was neutralized. It’s way easier to stop someone by shooting them than by means of persuasion. If you want to go down the conspiracy rabbit hole, then gunmen are always killed, dead men don’t answer questions.

yes, some in crowd may have been injured, but when has trump shown any hesitation to have pale injured or killed for his personal benefit (January 6th, church protests, etc).

Real people were actually killed here. Innocent bystanders. I think these people deserve that we be critical with our conspiracy theories. Trump would definitely not be above hurting his supporters if it would give him an advantage. He’s already hurting supporters financially.

his secret service were proven corrupt and involved in cover up measures for trump before (e.g. Deliberately erasing text messages relevant to January 6th)

Corrupt? Sure, but corrupt in what way? Some may just have been trying to cover their own asses.

this all happens as project 2025 narrative was taking form hold, leaked video/audio by the day and days before the RNC.

Part of me wants to follow you, part of me wants to say “Trump had some weirdo shoot at the audience while he cut his ear up. All to get rid of the project 2025 story”. I mean we’ve seen how Trump have diverted attention previously by doing crazy shit. But I’d caution linking the two things. The project 2025 can definitely be buried in the wake of this incident by the RNC, and the RNC most definitely will try to kill the story. But jumping from the RNC being opportunistic, to there being a conspiracy to make people forget 2025? That’s not just a small step, nor a giant leap, that’s a “flying a jetpack until it runs dry” kinda jump.

LOL sure, good one… Only time that square abomination is the answer is if the question is “what do you get if you put a toddler in charge of designing a poor knockoff unbrako head?”

TEAM TORX REPRESENT!

One way to get five star ratings would be climbing a tall building, enabling GOD MODE, and then blasting anything that moves with RPGs… At least that’s how I remember GTA San Andreas

Jeg er enig, lad os overtage produktionsmidlerne med magt og smide oligarkerne ud! /s

Spøg til side, hvad med at skaffe understøttelse til offentlig trafik ved at indføre en hæftig afgift på privatkørsel? Enten på brændstof eller pr km ved aflæsning til syn. Folket vil motiveres til at bruge bussen, og bussen kan køre oftere.

But of course, how else could you describe yourself as having experience with TeX? /s

I think our TeX savvy lemming here confuses a knowledge level in the expert/consultant sphere with “having experience”.

Having worked with LaTeX on and off for 15 years, and on occasions developing TeX macros (ie copy pasting stuff from stackoverflow and shotgun debugging it until it sorta works) and creating various graphics with PGF/TikZ, I would describe myself as having extended experience with the TeX environment. But I still can’t tell you exactly what causes \hbox underfull without looking it up… Probably because it’s never caused a failure to output my documents.

Ok, go on then, tell the class what underfull hbox is. And no googling!

What? No it doesn’t, it means that the exploit has been known for zero days, aka it’s an unknown exploit.

If it’s a zero day then Microsoft didn’t know about it. If Microsoft knew about the exploit for a year it was not a zero day.

skaaat? Godt nyt! Vi er vidst nok en generation yngre end vi troede

Nok ikke sådan jeg skal præsentere historien

Er jeg den eneste for hvem det river i ørerne, som en gaffel på en kridttavle, når DR’s såkaldte journalister blander rundt i nævnerne i deres brøker? En ud af fem svarer et eller andet, bagefter er det 4 ud af 10 der svarer det modsatte. WTF? Hvordan skal menigmand kunne sammenligne de to udtalelser? Det virker helt ærligt manipulererende. Bagefter er det 1 ud af 16, og derefter to ud af tre der siger det modsatte.

Er DR ude på at farve den offentlige holdning, eller forstår man ikke at præsentere data?

Nu var statistik heldigvis ikke et emne jeg trak til eksamen på uni, men en hurtig google efter beregning af statistisk usikkerhed giver denne side https://www.en-undersoegelse-viser.dk/beregn-usikkerhed/

Og ifølge den side er det ±1.3% ved 1025 respondenter. Men denne beregning tager ikke hensyn til diverse bias, som jokesvar og sproglige udfordringer. Beregningen siger blot noget om, hvor sikker man kan være på fordelingen i populationen.

I am indeed awaiting the big news headlines that will for some reason catch everyone by surprise when a LLM comes along that’s trained to “translate” machine code into a nice easily-comprehensible high-level programming language.

Another commenter dismissed the idea outright. WTF… What is implausible about an LLM that takes decompiled code, deals with the obfuscating bs, recognizes known libraries, and organizes the remaining code. That will totally happen, if it hasn’t already been done.

are you calling me a child? Because we have had sex, and if I’m a child, then you’re a pedophile. And I’m not going to be lectured to by a damn pervert!

This list is GREAT … but if you’d be willing to venture back to the late 90s or early 00s I’ll offer you three more names:

1. Fallout 2
2. Fallout
3. Mafia

All three are open world.

The right honourable, Sir Cunt?

Mother fucker! I nearly broke my tongue just trying to pronounce that in my head

It’s the /24 mask given on the .42 that’s a little suspicious because that’s not a common range for anything else.

Well now I know. I operate a ton of /24 subnets in the 172.16.0.0/12 scope. Technically I could fit them in the 192.168.0.0/16 scope, but I have lots of students connecting SoHo wifi-routers to the subnets, and this way it’s pretty easy to tell, if someone put the WAN cable in a LAN port when people are getting 192.168.1.0/24 DHCP offers.

What I meant was: why do I instinctively know that it’s shopped? As in what is technically wrong, not why is the photo manipulation crap. I wasn’t trying to offer critique, ffs I couldn’t make something even this convincing.