100% of the participants are gay, but it’s between opposite sexes, so is it heterosexual?
If a gay man orders 15 kilos of potatoes online through 4g network while he travels by train between Amsterdam and Paris with an average speed of 130km/h, how many liters of Fanta does he drink?
Enough to feel FANTAstic
Badum tshhhh
A good time is what it’s called
I don’t think either is enjoying it
Yeah as a lesbian it sounds uncomfortable, awkward, and overall unpleasant
Remember, it’s not gay if both dudes are straight…
Nah, in all seriousness, I think it would be heterosexual sex between two gay people? Idk. I suppose there is the ACT of heterosexual sex and then the identity of the individuals as hetero/gay/bi/whatever. So yea, in this case, heterosexual sex between 2 people that are gay. That’s all there is to it.
Having sex is gay
I believe the sex would he heterosexual, but the parties would still be homosexual. This happened a lot in lavender marriages. The fact they had sex to produce children didn’t change their sexuality.
Similarly, e.g. two bi men getting married is a gay wedding, even though neither party is gay. The relationship can be described independently of the people in it.
I think that’s why we call it “same-sex marriage” rather than “gay marriage”
Hey everyone in the comments, you seem to be experts on the terminology
Care to explain this comic to me? Oglaf: Memory (NSFW)
Ya this is so convoluted and I feel like there are several jokes that are supposed to be obvious here. Usually the joke in this kind of stuff is the absurdity of the entire thing.
You’d be right. OGLAF tends to have several layers of joke, most of them vulgar and absurd.
Are these two comics, or one comic where they turn into cats halfway through
One. They are just cat suits. Also, I think the characters never appear before or since so there is no context that can help.
My best guess is that the “hetero” part is her providing makeup and costumes (including the mouse to be thrown up) while the “homo” part is the singing…
What I’m getting from that is hetero girl-on-girl is somewhat performative and passive, instead of the hardcore fucking expected by the red-haired lesbian (hence “the lesbian”), as indicated by her response that she (the lesbian) would be doing all the work and her accepting the claim that the “straight” black-haired woman (hence “the straight”) will be doing makeup as her (the straight’s) hetero part of the hetero-homo sex-exchange. The second half is the absurdist punchline in the execution. Movie-level cosmetics, including realistic amounts of hair – enough to create a hairball during unknown forms of oralplay, presumably provided by the straight. And a dogged insistence from the lesbian that dislodging a hairball not end the sexual encounter, which required continuous singing. Perhaps it was a sexual rendition of the musical “Cats”, further tying in existing stereotypes of queer people and their relation with/affinity to theater and the fine arts.
Just like when two straight men have sex?
I’ve wondered the same thing when I was twelve, but eventually I grew up to realise that it was a stupid question.
Sir, this is a shitposting forum.
I get confused sometimes
Sir, this is a Wendy’s.
You know it’s not a great question but it’s better to ask in a relatively safe environment than to make assumptions.
You’re gay if you watch.
It’s also how gay people reproduce.
A third person watches and is Become Gay, Destroyer of Sphincters.
But if a baby results, it’s hermaphroditic.
What if that person is gay already, does he become super gay?
Super gay, or gay2, yassified.
Combine all these together, and you have “ultimate gay” actually, that’s the kind of Marvel movie I would like to watch.
I was hoping you’d say Cap’n Gay.
Cap’n Gay.
This happens in the movie The Wedding Banquet
I’d say sexual intercourse in itself can’t be homo- or heterosexual since that is a denomitor for people’s sexual attractions.
The sexual intercourse would simply be male-female sex.
they just happened to meet in a closet
Homo - same sex intercourse, hetero - man and woman having sex. Their orientation won’t make intercourse gay, it’s between different sexes so the act itself is heterosexual.
Nowadays hetero has been redefined to better reflect gender diversity. Homo is same gender, hetero is different genders, even if the gender are not man and woman. This includes non-binary people in the definition, as long as they are not the same gender, is not homosexual. And to be honest, it ties better to the word, etymologically.
Also bisexual now means homo and hetero, not men and women. I’m still confused about pansexuality in this definitions. I also might have got something wrong in this explanation as I’m a cis straight dude, who listens to other people saying this things.
What even is sex?
An act of intercourse. But yeah what is life?
What is intercourse?
Ask your mum
Yes.
Hetero - from the Greek ἕτερος meaning different or other
Homo - from the Greek ὁμός meaning same
Irregardless of the orientation of the people involved, if its two different gendered people having intercourse it’s heterosexual intercourse. It just wouldn’t be any fun for the people involved.
It’s only homo if it is clone sex. gotcha
