All the talk now is of how we might defend ourselves without the US. But almost everyone with a voice in public life appears to be avoiding a much bigger and more troubling question: how we might defend ourselves against the US.

As Keir Starmer visits the orange emperor’s court in Washington, let’s first consider the possibilities. I can’t comment on their likelihood, and I fervently hope that people with more knowledge and power than me are gaming them. One is that Donald Trump will not only clear the path for Vladimir Putin in Ukraine, but will actively assist him.

Now consider our vulnerabilities. Through the “Five Eyes” partnership, the UK automatically shares signals intelligence, human intelligence and defence intelligence with the US government. Edward Snowden’s revelations showed that the US, with the agreement of our government, conducts wholesale espionage on innocent UK citizens. The two governments, with other western nations, run a wide range of joint intelligence programmes, such as Prism, Echelon, Tempora and XKeyscore. The US National Security Agency (NSA) uses the UK agency GCHQ as a subcontractor.

  • rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Arguably, the US is already attacking Europe through their fascist tech companies. They’re quite overtly trying to influence our elections, and it’s not just Musk - the Facebook and Instagram algorithms clearly favour far right content and YouTube isn’t much better.

  • NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 days ago

    The most interesting thing about this piece is that Guardian editorial sticks close to establishment when it comes to foreign policy, so you know this is what they’re talking about in Whitehall.

  • jtsk2009@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    4 days ago

    Will Britain come to help Canada when the US decides to take our resources by force?

    • MouldyCat@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 days ago

      I’m sure we’d write a strongly worded letter demanding politely asking the US to withdraw immediately if they wouldn’t mind us sending some monitors to check on the conditions in the concentration camps.

      But seriously, what could the UK do? Send a few of our rinky dink frigates over the Atlantic? They’d be sunk before they’d left the Irish Sea.

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 days ago

    I think this is the salient point of the article.

    Like everyone without security clearance, I can make no well-informed statement on the extent to which any of them, nuclear or conventional, are operationally independent of the US.

    And with this article, he definitely hasn’t made any well informed statements.

      • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        Yes thank you, I do. Do you know what conspiracy rhetoric looks like?

        Monbiot can make, and has, any wishy-washy allegations and hide behind “oh but it’s all behind closed doors so just trust me, yeah?” to appeal to his “the truth is out there” readers.

        He’s classic guardian contrarian opinion writer.

        • intelisense@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Given the debacle at the White House, I definitely think we should withdraw from 5 eyes and set up a new intel sharing community with the other three members, maybe inviting France and Germany to join too.

          It’s true that a lot of sensible people worked behind the scenes. That past tense is not accidental - Trump is busy firing them all and replacing them with Russian tools.

          • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 days ago

            I don’t. But I trust more sensible heads that are, and always have, worked behind the public limelight. Both here and across Europe and the US.

            Let’s see what happens. Maybe Georgie boy will write another think piece?

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    I doubt we could defend ourselves if Belgium decided to invade.

    This could be key if things did spread to the Baltic states:

    Then we come to our weapon systems. Like everyone without security clearance, I can make no well-informed statement on the extent to which any of them, nuclear or conventional, are operationally independent of the US. But I know, to give just one example, that among the crucial components of our defence are F-35 stealth jets, designed and patented in the US. How stealthy they will turn out to be, when the US has the specs, the serial numbers and the software, is a question that needs an urgent answer.

    Nor can I make any confident statement about the extent to which weapons designed here might be dependent on US central processing units and other digital technologies, or on US systems such as Starlink, owned by Musk, or GPS, owned by the US Space Force. Which of our weapons systems could achieve battle-readiness without US involvement and consent? Which could be remotely disabled by the US military?

    During lockdown, a friend had special dispensation to travel, issued by the MOD so he could work on a supercomputer that the American-made planes needed to function properly. I bet the Americans could just switch that off if they didn’t want us using their technology against Russia.

    And this is all about physical warfare - they US could easily shut us down completely with cyber warfare. Or Musk might decide he wants all the data from HMRC as he has done in the US. I’d imagine working through GCHQ would make this possible.