• mesamune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    101
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Hopefully it gets peer reviewed soon. It’s interesting but I would like to see it reproduced before we say it was discovered.

    In a study that has yet to be peer reviewed

    • TH1NKTHRICE@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 days ago

      This article is from January. It has since been peer reviewed and published in Cell. But, having been peer reviewed has no bearing on reproducibility unless within this study they were to have multiple independent groups repeat their experiments. Which I don’t think they did. Still, good study I think.

    • SplashJackson@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’m a peer. I pee at least 6 times a day; more if I’d had a lot of water that day. Can I review it?

      • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        As a for-profit company that publishes scientific papers FOR MONEY, youre a perfect fit for our org. Welcome aboard!