• SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I mean, if they were going to try and burn down the Capitol Building, clearly the right people to have blamed would be us Canadians. We do have a bit of history doing just that. 😏

  • modifier@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    13 hours ago

    I’ve been waiting for the ideal time to unmask myself, and now seems as good a time as any.

    It is I. I am the president and CEO of Antifa, and I rule with an iron fist.

    I’ll take your questions now.

    • Bibliotectress@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hi! Yes, I have a question.

      Grocery prices have been hitting hard lately, and I’m looking into alternative meat sources. I would like to know if I were to join your company, could we literally eat the rich? Or, second best, take all their stuff?

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        God knows what wierd chemicals they are marinating in, and most of them are busy amassing private armies and creating microstates while working to erode the checks that currently limit their ability to essentially act as actual sovereign citizen, so it wouldn’t exactly be very calorically rewarding compared to the effort, but…

        NEXT!

      • modifier@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Obvious conservative plant question. Collective action itself is the iron fist with which I rule, thus a Union would be redundant.

  • ohellidk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    16 hours ago

    As soon as they announced that “antifa is a terrorist organization” I then knew exactly what they were up to. So the narrative was “fascism is good, and your a threat if you try to stop it”.

  • delirious_owl@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Every article that says the word “anarchist” should go out of their way to say that its not illegal to be a capitalist, a communist, or an anarchist. Its a legitimate political ideology thats been around for centuries.

    • Hackerman_uwu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Actually of all the “others” or “out groups” that exist, anarchists are the ones I cannot fucking take.

      Irony begin that I’m more aligned to their politics that I am to any of the others, I’ve just never met one that I like. Meta irony being that that is probably the most anarchic position to hold on other anarchists but I wouldn’t out money on that.

      • delirious_owl@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s strange. I’ve never met an anarchist that I didn’t like. They’re usually the kindest and most selfless people.

        Maybe try going to a mutual aid action, like Food Not Bombs?

  • bazus1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    17 hours ago

    [security contractors joined by officers hailing from across the federal government] converged for a mission dubbed “Operation Diligent Valor,” authorized under Executive Order 13933, purportedly to apprehend “anarchists and left-wing extremists” who’d been driven by Floyd’s murder to target U.S. monuments commemorating slave owners and Confederate traitors — dangerous individuals, Trump said, advancing a “fringe ideology” painting the U.S. government as “fundamentally unjust.”

    Irony is dead.

    • PriorityMotif@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      17 hours ago

      My p-doc is from Vietnam and went on an unsolicited rant on how you should never trust the government. Trump is literally the inverse of sanity.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          …that actually makes a disturbing amount of sense. a very disturbing amount of sense.

          I’m gonna go smoke a joint

        • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          I hope you’re being sarcastic…

          If you really think this started with Trump and stopped with Trump, that’s what they want.

          This is simply a continuation of Cointelpro and we saw the same tactics used against college campus protests under Biden.

          • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Of course it’s someone from ml that can’t take a joke without getting upset that I didn’t call Biden a genocidal fascist.

            • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              12 hours ago

              Of course it’s someone from ml that can’t take a joke

              Of course it’s someone from world who posts perfect “poes law” bait and then cries about ml users. I literally started with

              I hope you’re being sarcastic…

              The followed with

              If you really think

              So here’s a tip for the future.

              if 1 of 2 conjunction ˈif əf

              1 a : in the event that b : allowing that c : on the assumption that d : on condition that

              that I didn’t call Biden a genocidal fascist.

              Cointelpro and government crackdown on any opposition to the right wing liberal order goes well beyond Biden, it just continued under him. You’re showing your absolutely unserious and reactionary team sport mentality.

              • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Their comment specified “For Trump”

                That implies that they are doing the same thing, but for Biden. Obviously.
                How do you not get that?

                You won’t see what I chose not to say here. I don’t often have random vitriol for internet strangers, but goddamn.

                • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 hours ago

                  Their comment specified “For Trump”

                  That implies that they are doing the same thing, but for Biden. Obviously.

                  No it doesn’t. They could be implying it was a Trump specific policy.

                  “they did this specifically for Trump, they probably don’t do it anymore”

                  Vs

                  “They probably don’t specifically do it for Trump anymore”

                  Without knowing them or making assumptions I can’t fill in which interpretation they went with, hence why I said “I hope you’re being sarcastic”, implying I hope they were more in line with the 2nd interpretation.

                  You won’t see what I chose not to say here. I don’t often have random vitriol for internet strangers, but goddamn.

                  If this is what broke you down, I really don’t believe that lol.