• Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Their comment specified “For Trump”

    That implies that they are doing the same thing, but for Biden. Obviously.
    How do you not get that?

    You won’t see what I chose not to say here. I don’t often have random vitriol for internet strangers, but goddamn.

    • antmzo220@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Their comment specified “For Trump”

      That implies that they are doing the same thing, but for Biden. Obviously.

      No it doesn’t. They could be implying it was a Trump specific policy.

      “they did this specifically for Trump, they probably don’t do it anymore”

      Vs

      “They probably don’t specifically do it for Trump anymore”

      Without knowing them or making assumptions I can’t fill in which interpretation they went with, hence why I said “I hope you’re being sarcastic”, implying I hope they were more in line with the 2nd interpretation.

      You won’t see what I chose not to say here. I don’t often have random vitriol for internet strangers, but goddamn.

      If this is what broke you down, I really don’t believe that lol.

      • Monument@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        Okay.

        I gotta admit. I don’t care.

        And shit - do you see what they’re doing to the campus protestors? They are all fucking bad and we live in a police state.

        But you’re throwing stones because someone didn’t contort their comment to equivocate Trump to Biden, who wasn’t a topic of conversation?