Flying Squid@lemmy.world to aww@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoMeet Scout, Minnesota's First Dog. He is a rescue, which is the best way to get a dog.lemmy.worldexternal-linkmessage-square64fedilinkarrow-up1964arrow-down129
arrow-up1935arrow-down1external-linkMeet Scout, Minnesota's First Dog. He is a rescue, which is the best way to get a dog.lemmy.worldFlying Squid@lemmy.world to aww@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square64fedilink
minus-squareteamevil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·3 months agoThe Wisconsinites are expensive to feed…
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·3 months agoYeah, Minnesota almost ran out of cheese, Vikings fans, and beer!
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down1·3 months agoIronically… Minnesota produced more cheese (and dairy products in general. Land O Lakes is based here.) and Wisconsin has more lakes.
minus-squareA_cook_not_a_chef@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·3 months agoHold up. They only have more lakes because they count ponds. A lake in Minnesota is “a body of water greater than 10 acres”. Wisconsin does not have a standard. https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/may/23/sara-meaney/who-has-more-lakes-minnesota-or-wisconsin/
minus-squareFuglyDuck@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·3 months agoDetails…. Details…. (You’re not wrong, that is why. But still I like some good irony.)
minus-squareViking_Hippie@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·3 months agoTo be fair, depending on her physical stature, the woman behind the quote is a big Meaney!
minus-squarebitchkat@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoThat’s only because Wisconsin defines “lake” differently.
The Wisconsinites are expensive to feed…
Yeah, Minnesota almost ran out of cheese, Vikings fans, and beer!
Ironically… Minnesota produced more cheese (and dairy products in general. Land O Lakes is based here.) and Wisconsin has more lakes.
Hold up. They only have more lakes because they count ponds. A lake in Minnesota is “a body of water greater than 10 acres”. Wisconsin does not have a standard.
https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2019/may/23/sara-meaney/who-has-more-lakes-minnesota-or-wisconsin/
Details…. Details….
(You’re not wrong, that is why. But still I like some good irony.)
To be fair, depending on her physical stature, the woman behind the quote is a big Meaney!
That’s only because Wisconsin defines “lake” differently.