the writer Nina Illingworth, whose work has been a constant source of inspiration, posted this excellent analysis of the reality of the AI bubble on Mastodon (featuring a shout-out to the recent articles on the subject from Amy Castor and @[email protected]):

Naw, I figured it out; they absolutely don’t care if AI doesn’t work.

They really don’t. They’re pot-committed; these dudes aren’t tech pioneers, they’re money muppets playing the bubble game. They are invested in increasing the valuation of their investments and cashing out, it’s literally a massive scam. Reading a bunch of stuff by Amy Castor and David Gerard finally got me there in terms of understanding it’s not real and they don’t care. From there it was pretty easy to apply a historical analysis of the last 10 bubbles, who profited, at which point in the cycle, and where the real money was made.

The plan is more or less to foist AI on establishment actors who don’t know their ass from their elbow, causing investment valuations to soar, and then cash the fuck out before anyone really realizes it’s total gibberish and unlikely to get better at the rate and speed they were promised.

Particularly in the media, it’s all about adoption and cashing out, not actually replacing media. Nobody making decisions and investments here, particularly wants an informed populace, after all.

the linked mastodon thread also has a very interesting post from an AI skeptic who used to work at Microsoft and seems to have gotten laid off for their skepticism

  • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    this is also the marketing for quantum computing. Yes, there is a big money market for quantum computers in 2023. They still can’t reliably factor 35.

    • Steve@awful.systems
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      shit, I forgot about quantum computing. If you don’t game, do video production or render 3d models, you’re upgrading your computer to keep up with the demands of client-side rendered web apps and the operating system that loads up the same Excel that has existed for 30 years.

      Lust for computing power is a great match for AI

      • David Gerard@awful.systemsM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        i literally upgrade computers in the past decade purely to get ones that can take more RAM because the web now sends 1000 characters of text as a virtual machine written in javascript rather than anything so tawdry as HTML and CSS

        • raktheundead@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every day, we pay the price for embracing a homophobe’s 10-day hack comprising a shittier version of Lisp.

        • self@awful.systemsOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          the death of server-side templating and the lie of server-side rendering (which practically just ships the same virtual machine to you but with a bunch more shit tacked on that doesn’t do anything) really has done fucked up things to the web

          • 200fifty@awful.systems
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            as someone who never really understood The Big Deal With SPAs (aside from, like, google docs or whatever) i’m at least taking solace in the fact that like a decade later people seem to be coming around to the idea that, wait, this actually kind of sucks