• ᗪᗩᗰᑎ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve got my vote for the guy who thought carbon fiber would do great under pressure after being told “no” by tons of experts in the field.

  • Frater Mus@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Given that it’d already killed someone, I’m going to nominate the second guy who thought he could cowboy criticality testing with the Demon Core at Los Alamos.

    By coincidence, at this moment I am camped on a mountain overlooking the Los Alamos NL.

    “Win stupid games, earn stupid prizes”?

    BTW, I think it’s play stupid games…

  • Vincent St. Pierre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is this guy who killed 40,000 elephants because he thought it’d improve the environment.

    His name was Allan Savory.

    Anyways, it was a poor decision, which harmed the natural regrowth of grasses in Africa. And probably contributed to drought and poor soil conditions there. Sadly, he has been regarded as an expert and heralded as an environmentalist par excellance. So, less of a stupid prize for him than a poor prize for humanity writ-large.

  • floofloof@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the saying is, “Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.” You can edit post titles on Lemmy.

    • INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Steam powered rocket sounds crazy but it would of worked if they didn’t shoot him down with the space laser.

      Sad fact: he only made it about 500m so he never even found out.

      We may never know.

      • erogenouswarzone@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I feel like that’s how a lot of these go. We could’ve had flying pintos if they had used larger wings. But then the inventor dies and their work rarely gets picked up again, even though most of the heavy lifting is done.

  • Donebrach@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Probably the most pedestrian and US-centric answer but Japan bombing Pearl Harbor comes to mind almost immediatly.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The most US-centric answer would be the hundreds of seditionists at the Capitol on 1/6/21 who later got arrested.

    • Qualanqui@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      You would think that, but the big banks made out like absolutely crazy from the derivatives and then got to seize a whole swathe of land they then sold on for even more money or kept for themselves and used to artificially inflate the rental markets while at the same time curb stomping their competition thus giving them a much larger piece of the pie after everything shook out.

      The real own goal here is the poor saps who thought they were getting a cheap mortgage until the interest rates started going up and up.

  • Saigonauticon@voltage.vn
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty much the entire three kingdoms period in China. No one accomplishes what they set out to do, all the great heroes die ordinary deaths due to politics or disease, and everything they create gets arbitrarily absorbed into a Jin dynasty that none of them foresaw (except maybe Kong Ming) or wanted.

    Awesome story though.

    • KluEvo@wirebase.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Eh, I’d argue that it was less stupid games and prizes and more… Unusually equally matched candidates vying for the throne? I mean, think of the warring states, or the Chu-Han contention, or whatever the fuck was going on in Five Dynasties and Ten Kingdoms.

      In each of the cases, after the fall/overthrow of the previous dynasty, multiple powerful folks threw their hats into the ring. Warring states ended with Qin beating its rivals. Liu Bang out maneuvered Xiang Yu to reunite all/most of China. The Song Dynasty succeeded where all the previous 5 Dynasties failed and absorbed the ten kingdoms. The Three Kingdoms era was mostly similar, but somehow the three major contestants managed to almost perfectly balance their power and just got stuck at an impasse for long enough that the good ol’ classic causes of the downfalls of Chinese dynasties (corruption of bureaucracy and the imperial families) took hold.

      On reddit, I once read a really good perspective of the whole thing. To summarize: one of the greatest tragedies of the three kingdoms was that Liu Bei, Cao Cao, and Sun Quan were born in the same conflict era, as each of them were more than capable rulers and leaders that had what it would have taken to unite china. Meanwhile, the other conflict eras had only one or two truly capable emperor-aspirants that had the potential to take it all.

      • Saigonauticon@voltage.vn
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s an interesting summary! I don’t know that much about all of those periods of history. Mostly the R3K era, some Song dynasty. Also Vietnamese history, which has a lot of really random bits.

        The greatest tragedies are often the conflict between completely acceptable powers, not good and evil.

        I thought Sun Quan was the weakest of the three leaders though. So indicisive!

        • KluEvo@wirebase.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The greatest tragedies are often the conflict between completely acceptable powers, not good and evil.

          Yeah, that’s a really good takeaway from this kinda of history.

          Sun Quan was the weakest of the three leaders though. So indicisive!

          In terms of individuality and becoming emperor of all of China, perhaps. He had a surprising number of really competent aides and generals, when compared to Cao Cao and Liu Bei. He was the kind of leader that was much more of a skilled manager of capable talent than a director who knew exactly what commands to give. In the long term, tho, this admittedly lead to politicking and infighting that cause Eastern Wu to rollover and die.

          Also, it’s worth considering that he was also arguably the most important of the three for their legacy. The Southeastern part of China is incredibly important /influencial in later chinese history, from Tang to Song to Ming and all the way to today, and Sun Quan had the unenviable task of fully absorbing the distinct jiangnan and southern chinese customs and idiosyncrasies into what we nowadays think of as chinese culture.

          • Saigonauticon@voltage.vn
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s an interesting take on it! It’s true Sun Quan had cultivated some good generals. Heck, Wu was the last of the 3 standing so I guess that counts for something.

            Another big lesson I got out of the era was that the skills to build an empire are very different from the skills to run it. So an empire built by a great hero, can easily be mismanaged by the same hero. Then, when an empire is passed on through heredity, there is no guarantee that the new leader possesses either set of skills. This seems to be one of the major ways that empires fall apart.

            I work with some large family-run Chinese companies. There were ones with a certain flavor of weak leadership which really confused me before I looked at it this way. Now I’m better aware of why this happens, the time scale and method of the resulting descent into chaos, and how to convince and maneuver my employers to profit from it. Similar things come up sometimes in Vietnam too, but somehow I never really connected the dots before.

            Also apparently eunuchs ruin everything. I feel that there’s a more modern analogy, maybe people who play politics for personal gain inside companies instead of through the merit of their own work? Can’t quite put my finger on it.

  • AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Thomas Edison famously tried to prove that AC current was more dangerous than his DC current. (Edison was pushing DC current for long distance transmission and as home electrical service.) To do this he electruted Topsy the elephant in front of an audience. When the AC current wouldn’t kill Topsy he switched to DC current and zapped her to death.

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t know that this one really counts. First, as stewie said, Edison didn’t electrocute Topsy (though he did film it).

      But anyway, what “stupid prizez” did Edison win? An enormous pile of money and immortal fame and admiration?

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although Edison was a complete ass, and did lasting damage to the world by teaming up with JP Morgan to extinguish Nikola Tesla’s work, he wasn’t the one who electrocuted Topsy.

    • DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean… if you use DC digitally (I.e turning it on and off making it binary code), it really is a cleaner information transmission than AC. But I doubt that’s what Edison had in mind.

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although Edison was a complete ass, and did lasting damage to the world by teaming up with JP Morgan to extinguish Nikola Tesla’s work, he wasn’t the one who electrocuted Topsy.

    • stewie3128@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Although Edison was a complete ass, and did lasting damage to the world by teaming up with JP Morgan to extinguish Nikola Tesla’s work, he wasn’t the one who electrocuted Topsy.