Removed by mod

What are reliable sources in your opinion to examine China’s genocidal policies?

@[email protected]

@[email protected]

Instead of questioning sources, you could just name sources on China’s genocidal politics that you think are reliable. Where are they?

Rule 1: Title must match the article headline

• Russia’s losses amount to 65,000 soldiers dead or injured over the last two months alone

• Russian fatalities in Ukraine in the four years of the full-scale war are five times greater than all Russian and Soviet wars since World War Two combined

• Moscow’s losses in Ukraine are now more than 17 times greater than the Soviet Union’s losses in Afghanistan (1979-1989) and 11 times greater than Russian forces killed in both Chechen wars (1994-1996, 1999-2009)

• In January, Zelenskiy said 50,000 Russian losses per month would be “the optimal level” to ensure Russian losses in Ukraine became unsustainable for Moscow to replace with new recruits

Source

This statement makes no sense. China’s mercantilism - pushing for trade surpluses in practically all industries - wouldn’t even work if pursued by all countries (a trade surplus for everyone is logically impossible, and the attempt doesn’t end well as we have seen in Europe 300 or so years ago).

Beijing is subsidizing some sort of a zombie economy as many companies would long be shut down without massive state subsidies that go well beyond what can be considered reasonable. In the EV industry, for example, only 15 of 129 Chinese EV brands are expected to be profitable by 2030, according to a report from last year.

The US and China are artificially creating economic imbalances, it’s just that one is doing it mainly by tariffs and the other by deliberately producing oversupply.

[Edit for clarity.]

The statements come from an Iranian senior official. He said forces were given

“full authority and a blank check to attack, with the aim of creating maximum fear to deter the resurgence of protests.”

And the senior official speaking at the meeting was presenting

assessments by security bodies that sharply contradict the government’s official figures on the killings.

Yeah, as Carney said already back in April, China is a foreign interference and security threat for Canada.

Canada’s Prime Minister Mark Carney said that China is one of the largest threats with respect to foreign interference in Canada and is an emerging threat in the Arctic … Carney said Canada has to counter Chinese foreign interference threats. He also criticized China for being a partner with Russia in the war with Ukraine and said it is a threat to broader Asia and Taiwan in particular … Carney said China is the biggest threat “from a geopolitical sense.”

“We’re taking action to address,” [Carney] added.

So Carney has a clear and realistic picture. Let’s hope he is doing the right thing for Canada now.

Purchasing Power Parity.

It’s a method that adjusts a country’s GDP to its local level of prices and living expenses. This makes it possible to compare the GDP across different countries. Comparing the countries’ nominal GDPs would be misleading as, simply speaking, earning 1,000 dollars in New York City or London has a different meaning than earning the same amount somewhere in the Global South where price levels are usually lower.

The GDP per capita in Iran is USD 5,800 with GDP per capita PPP ~16,200.

Official inflation rate has been further rising in 2025 reaching almost 50% year-on-year.

Western and Chinese public media are two fundamentally different systems. You can’t explain this by just one simple buzz word like ‘Gaza.’ Mbugua N’gang is absolutely right.

@[email protected]

Not to condone these actions but strange that this most poignant part is left out of OP’s summary.

And? What’s strange here?

“I discussed obviously the situation in terms of Irish beef exports into China, the tariff situation in respect of dairy products”

Yeah, Xi Jinping increased prices for dairy products for Chinese people by introducing tariffs, very much as Trump did in the US for other goods. It’s time that Ireland and other EU farmers diversify its trade imo.

And what did they say about forced labour and the China’s genocide in East Turkistan, Tibet? Beiijng’s aggression against Taiwan? Was that an issue?

It’s needless to say that I don’t support the U.S. attack on Venezuela as it is beyond the rule of law, but Spain’s PM Pedro Sanchez joins these critics to distract from his own corruption scandals. This is is some sort of staged morality as Sanchez is fighting for his political survival.

I posted this in another thread, but when reading the comments it may fit also here.

Ivashov is for sure pro-Russian in principle, and certainly not what we would call pro-Western or a friend of democracy. He and his fellow generals warned, however, of a war against Ukraine already early 2022.

On 1 February 2022, roughly three weeks before Russia invaded Ukraine, Leonid Ivashov, then chairman of the All-Russian Officers Assembly, published a piece titled, ‘On the Eve of War?’ – Appeal of the All-Russian Officers Assembly to the President and Citizens of the Russian Federation, warning about a war against Ukraine:

Today mankind is living in expectation of war. A war inevitably means human casualties, destruction, suffering for large masses of people, loss of the habitual way of life, and the disruption of the vital systems of states and peoples. A big war is an enormous tragedy, someone’s grave crime. And it so happens that Russia has found itself in the center of this imminent catastrophe.

And this is perhaps happening for the first time in its history. In the past, Russia (the Soviet Union) waged necessary (justified) wars, generally when there was no other way out, when the vital interests of the state and society were under threat. But what is threatening Russia’s existence today? And are there really any such threats anyway?

He then continues criticizing Putin’s foreign policy:

Naturally, in order for Ukraine to remain a friendly neighbor for Russia, Russia would have had to demonstrate the attractiveness of its state model and system of government. But Russia never became a friendly neighbor; its model of development and foreign policy mechanism for international cooperation repelled almost all its neighbors and beyond. Russia’s appropriation of the Crimea and Sevastopol, and their nonrecognition as Russian by the international community (meaning that the majority of countries in the world still believe they belong to Ukraine) are convincing proof of the failure of Russian foreign policy and the unattractiveness of its domestic policy. Attempts to use ultimatums and the threat of force to make [others] “fall in love with” Russia and its leaders are pointless and extremely dangerous.

Ivashov, usually maintaining a hard line against the West, refused the Kremlin’s public propaganda of Nato being a threat:

As far as external threats are concerned, they definitely exist. But in our expert opinion, they are not critical at the moment, and do not pose a direct threat to the existence of Russian statehood and its vital interests. Strategic stability has been preserved overall, nuclear weapons are under reliable control and groups of NATO forces are not amassing or displaying any threatening activity. Therefore, the explosive situation surrounding Ukraine is primarily artificial and self-serving for some internal forces, including in Russia.

He then addresses the threat a war could pose to the Russian state:

The use of military force against Ukraine will, first of all, call into question Russia’s very existence as a state. Second, it will turn Russians and Ukrainians into mortal enemies. Third, thousands (tens of thousands) of young, healthy people will die on both sides, which will naturally have an effect on the future demographic situation in our dying countries. On the battlefield field – if there is a battle – Russian troops will face not just Ukrainian soldiers, many of whom will be [ethnically] Russian, but also NATO troops and equipment, while NATO member states will be obligated to declare war against Russia … In addition, there is no doubt that Russia will be added to the category of countries that pose a threat to peace and international security, subjected to the most severe sanctions, transformed into a pariah in the eyes of the international community and probably lose the status of an independent state. There is no way that the president, the government and the Defense Ministry do not understand these consequences.

Finally, they address Putin himself, demanding his resignation:

We, Russia’s officers, demand that the Russian president abandon the criminal policy of provoking a war in which Russia will find itself alone against the united forces of the West and create conditions for implementing Art. 3 of the Russian Constitution [which states that the people are the only source of power – Trans.] and resign.

The whole 'article" is staged as it misses the point as half of the truth is not even mentioned. I won’t discuss articles published by such sources. It’s outright sensationalist bullshit.

The world socialist website promotes (false) anti-Western, pro-China, pro-Russia propaganda narratives only. This is part of disinformation network.

‘Putin Told Me’ – Trump’s Trust Test as Russia Revives Familiar Playbook – (Web archive link)

… Trump was taking questions at the doorstep of his Mar-a-Lago residence on Tuesday … when he offered a striking explanation for why he was “furious” over an alleged Ukrainian attack on Russian soil: Russian President Vladimir Putin had told him about it himself.

“You know who told me about it?” the president said, recounting claims that Ukraine had tried to strike one of Putin’s residences in northern Russia. “President Putin told me about it” … Trump said he was “very angry” about the alleged attack, calling it an unacceptable escalation – even while conceding that the incident might not have happened at all.

“It’s possible too, I guess,” Trump said. “But President Putin told me this morning it did.”

For critics in Washington and Europe, the episode sharpened a long-simmering concern: Trump’s apparent readiness to accept Putin’s word at face value, even as Kyiv denied the claim and US intelligence agencies had not publicly confirmed it …

As an addition: In related news, Putin Orders New Offensives against Ukraine After Trump Said Russia Wants Peace

It’s not on me to decide how many children people should have.

It’s not on the government to decide how many children people should have.