No, I’m pointing out, again, about the reduction of votes they got. They are the only party with the potential for seats to support ending genocide. They had less votes and lost seats.
I’m not saying it was their only issue but it clearly wasn’t an important issue for Australians based on that.
If it was important to Australians, more would have voted for the greens. Australians either didn’t care or supported genocide instead.
It’s not like the USA where it was a hold your nose situation. We have preferential voting. If people cared about other issues, they could still preference the greens for their genocide stance, of they deemed it important. they did not.
No, I’m pointing out, again, about the reduction of votes they got. They are the only party with the potential for seats to support ending genocide. They had less votes and lost seats.
I’m not saying it was their only issue but it clearly wasn’t an important issue for Australians based on that.
If it was important to Australians, more would have voted for the greens. Australians either didn’t care or supported genocide instead.
It’s not like the USA where it was a hold your nose situation. We have preferential voting. If people cared about other issues, they could still preference the greens for their genocide stance, of they deemed it important. they did not.