• commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Damn. People here sure love purity testing. The guy could pay for their cancer treatment and still slap him every chance because they got it wrong publicly in the past but once you get it wrong publicly once, you’re out of the club. Go be a conservative we don’t want you. When someone at Tuta has a bad year and ends up in the wrong publicly, find another email service to try and convince people to go too. Probably worse in functionality than Tuta as you go down to smaller and worse funded efforts in this niche field of Internet activism

    But people here do it here too to Mozilla because they don’t like their social outreach programs and their attempts to get advertising revenue so screw Mozilla too. So because nothing but perfection is acceptable, push away people that may be adjacent/left leaning right and switch to less developed products. Switch from Firefox and attack Mozilla who do the bulk of Firefox development and use Waterfox who do a custom deployment/build. Pure display of perfection being the enemy of good here.

    You want people to embrace privacy but keep whiplashing people around when the org/anyone in leadership says something wrong. Screw Signal, they’re not perfect. Screw Matrix/Element, some developer said something one day so it’s all bad. I’m surprised anyone here uses any privacy software or a major open source software like Linux or Krita or Blender at the risk that someone in the background may be wrong in someway which I am 100% certain they exist in important positions. Same with Lemmy

    Go back to the 60s and you all would be shitting on Fred Hampton for accepting the impure and the color coalition for everyone that had ever said something wrong. Al Franken definitely would not make it with y’all. Y’all can’t build up leftist communities because y’all are bitter assholes that can’t move on and spend so much time purity testing. Y’all are probably mediocre too so can’t make a difference in privacy and data ownership activism anyways so should be lining up to support not just Tuta, someone hasn’t screwed up publicly yet, and Proton

    Reminds me of Aung San Suu Kyi. She was under the gun of the military ruling class that permitted limited democratic government and because she didn’t make speech as if she lived in the US, a bunch of Americans turned on her and celebrated when the military dictatorship came back to rule and put her in prison the moment it seemed like the civilian government would actually assert more power

  • jsomae@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I am sad because of all the people in this thread who think the CEO is “fascist-sympathetic” because he said Trump did something better than the Democrats one time.

    • Nobilmantis@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Absolutely agreed. I think when you have such role in a company you should avoid making political statements at all, because no matter what you say you will end up upsetting some people. In this case, “try-hard” democrats.

  • dutchkimble@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    12 hours ago

    But I already use proton and purchased outside the Apple Store (on the proton website) and use it on my iPhone? What changed?

    • ugjka@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      You mean tariffs on services and the EU been floating the idea of putting tariff on US big tech

  • throwawayacc0430@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    So, Mr. Yen, are you still sympathetic to the republicans, who have a disdain for the same courts that gave you a win?

    Or is your head burried so deep in your particle accelerator you don’t even have any clue about politics?

    Dude thinks he knows everything because he has a PhD in Physics, literally out of touch with the politics that anyone doing 5 minutes of web searching can understand.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Dude thinks he knows everything because he has a PhD in Physics, literally out of touch with the politics that anyone doing 5 minutes of web searching can understand.

      This is such a common thing. STEM education needs to be more well rounded.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Why? Idiots thinking they know more than they do won’t be stopped by this. Also if we wanted to round humanities and liberal arts by making it mandatory to pass analysis, linear algebra, organic chemistry and classical physics would just lead to much more people not graduating anything.

        School is for a general education. Academia is for specialization.

    • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      What does politics even have to do with a ruling like this? Isn’t the law separated from the government in the US? Or is the US just a corrupt country that allow people to influence the judges ruling to impact the lawsuit in a certain outcome … O wait …

    • chamgireum@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      20 hours ago

      no no, you see Trump is totally anti-big tech. once he bleeds them dry from all the bribes they’ll be gone! /s

  • nous@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    344
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    Yen also pointed out how such a court decision could help cut inflation in the US, too, “by dropping the price of a significant chunk of digital purchases by 30% overnight”.

    I bet most companies will just take that extra 30% as profit rather than giving it back to their users like proton has.

    • athairmor@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah, even of the companies don’t pocket the difference, he’s an idiot to suggest that this will cut inflation.

      This guy is just not very smart, I think.

      • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        104
        ·
        1 day ago

        I think he’s a salesperson trying to sell the idea that getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

        • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          41
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

          I mean that’s not wrong. I had no idea Apple was double-dipping like this. I wonder if Google is doing the same thing…

            • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              They literally do not lol

              In game purchases in steam games don’t have to pay Valve, nor does Valve prevent you from uploading your game to other stores, which is what this ruling was about.

            • hikaru755@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              What? Since when does Valve prohibit companies from redirecting customers to non-Valve purchasing flows? Because that’s what this ruling is about, it says Apple can’t prohibit apps from telling users to go buy off-platform for lower prices. Valve isn’t doing that with Steam afaik, actually I’m not aware of any other platform that does this

              • JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                16
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Valve will even allow developers to create their own Steam keys free of charge and sell them wherever they want with no commission whatsoever

                That’s pretty open I’d say

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              34
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Every company who takes a cut from in-app purchases, be it subscriptions or DLC, should be kneecapped by this ruling.

              It’s one thing for the hosting marketplace (App Store, Steam, Play Store, etc) to take a cut from the initial purchase of a game/app. But it’s a whole other issue for that initial marketplace to keep reaching further into the dev’s pockets and take a cut from in-app purchases unrelated to where it was originally obtained.

              • Greercase@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                21
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though. That way apple never gets a cut because the “purchase” is in-app. Pay to be listed (maybe tiered depending on downloads) seems fair especially because it doesn’t incentivize people to do scammy things with pricing. It’s already a fee anyway.

              • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I’m not entirely optimistic about this ruling, but we’ll see.

                Apple had no reason NOT to give refunds and then use their weight to claw it back from the app developer.

                But what happens when not-too-legit apps use non-AppStore external sites to unlock features in an app?

                In a perfect world it’s cheap and easy and reliable.

                But it can also be a scammy shop that lures you into expensive subscriptions with no easy way to cancel them (eg. gym membership) and what happens when Little Timmy spends $9000 for Nlartbux in a mobile game’s external store?

                Could go either way 🤷🏻‍♂️

                • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  I’m not entirely optimistic about this ruling, but we’ll see.

                  Apple had no reason NOT to give refunds and then use their weight to claw it back from the app developer.

                  Greed.

                  But what happens when not-too-legit apps use non-AppStore external sites to unlock features in an app?

                  I suppose we will see what happens. That’s a very slippery slope though, full of FUD, and is the same logic that Apple, Microsoft, and others try to use to keep users locked into their walled gardens.

                  In a perfect world it’s cheap and easy and reliable.

                  But it can also be a scammy shop that lures you into expensive subscriptions with no easy way to cancel them (eg. gym membership) and what happens when Little Timmy spends $9000 for Nlartbux in a mobile game’s external store?

                  Could be. Multiple alternative markets exist for Android already though, and some shops are scammy as fuck. Google has already put protections in place to prevent sideloading potentially harmful apps (including alternative markets), but the savvy user who knows how to bypass those restrictions should* know how to spot scammy shit.

                  Could go either way 🤷🏻‍♂️

                  “For your security” was never about security.

                • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  what happens when Little Timmy spends $9000 for Nlartbux in a mobile game’s external store?

                  That’s why you don’t put your credit card info in a phone or tablet and let kids play with it.

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            What do you mean “double dipping”? I don’t own any Apple products. I purchased through Proton’s website.

            • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              If someone purchases a Proton plan through their iOS app, Apple got a 30% cut of that. Which is stupid. Because Proton (and every other company with an iOS app) already pays Apple to simply have their app on Apple’s app store.

              • Ulrich@feddit.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                Proton…already pays Apple to simply have their app on Apple’s app store.

                Uhhh I mean they pay a $100/year developer fee, which probably doesn’t even cover the infrastructure costs. Is that what you’re referring to?

                I’m not arguing against you, Apple should consider those costs as a service to their (overpaying) customers. I’m just not sure what other costs you’re referring to.

                • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Is that what you’re referring to?

                  Yes (I thought it was more, but w/e). I’ll admit, I don’t know a whole lot about development and everything that it entails, but nuance is key here. Say what you will about Proton, but this ruling just set a precedent that a company hosting an app/game download cannot take a cut from purchases completed within said app/game. That affects everyone.

                  I’m just looking at this from a bigger picture perspective. Apple has more than enough money already, and frankly there are far too many companies like this who need to be cut back down.

      • glimse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Or he’s just shitting on other companies who he knows are too greedy to do the same. Proton is getting positive press for this and he’s leaning into it with a bit of hyperbole

        Not saying he’s a genius or anything, he’s just a spokesperson doing spokesperson things

        • paraphrand@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          How many years until prices go up? I bet they marked down 1-2 years where they realize they can’t up the prices. But after, it will creep up.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah, Proton is bucking the obvious trend, with this one. Most companies will totally take the profits rather than lowering prices.

    • Zak@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 day ago

      Companies that were app-first like mobile games probably won’t cut prices much if any. Companies that were web-first like Proton and Patreon probably will.

    • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      13 hours ago

      i’m scared how many ceos don’t understand that rapid fall of inflation or zero inflation is bad because it means your economy is stagnant.

      • Saleh@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        That is a very broad generalization. First of all inflation is not just some co-product of economic activity. It has specific reasons. An economy is not stagnant because the oil price sinks after geopolitical tensions ease. An economy is not stagnant because businesses are kept from price gouging in cartels or monopoly situations.

        Also “stagnant” is not inherently bad. The reason why we need economic growth is because the super rich are siphoning off more and more wealth, so economic growth is the only thing keeping poor people from revolting. A zero growth or even degrowth economy could serve the people very well, if wealth wouldn’t be hoarded away by select few.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep, product prices are not based on costs but rather just the absolute maximum of what consumers are willing to pay.

      Proton just seems to be an exception.

  • suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    91
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    If they can charge 30% less without Apple’s fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don’t buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

    • Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      108
      ·
      1 day ago

      Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn’t change it then:

      Because Apple literally tells people that they’re not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago…

      • patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Some things do charge different amounts though. YouTube Premium for example is more expensive if you subscribe in iOS but maybe that’s just because it’s Google.

        They also could have just not let anyone subscribe through the iOS app. Lots of things do that.

        • errer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          1 day ago

          I’ve noticed this too, there’s no consistency. Some companies seem to get away with two prices, others not.

          • DeathsEmbrace@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            When people tell you the laws are behind internet they’re taking about this all of this ND social media is unregulated but imagine if psychological abuse was the reason social media was successful.

      • Ulrich@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is the same on most platforms. You’ll rarely find a product for different prices in different places because if they’re listed on Amazon, Steam, Apple, Google, etc. they’re not allowed to.

        • Buelldozer@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          That isn’t exactly true with Steam. Valve does allow a dev to offer a discount at a different store as long as that same discount comes to Steam in a reasonable amount of time.

          Straight from the docs:“It’s OK to run a discount for Steam Keys on different stores at different times as long as you plan to give a comparable offer to Steam customers within a reasonable amount of time.”

          • Max@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            That’s probably only for selling steam keys on another store. You might be able to sell non steam versions for any price you want

          • Ulrich@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 day ago

            Yes but recent lawsuits have exposed that their policies and their enforcement aren’t aligned.

      • Cort@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Most favored nation clause. Apple gets the lowest price that you offer. I’d you offer any discounts elsewhere, that have to be the same on the app store

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      1 day ago

      It doesn’t matter either way. Never do it that anyway. You would think people would learn a thing after being thoroughly fucked by apple and google…

      It is amazing how sundar and Tim literally violated you in sexually uncomfortable ways but you are crying about Andy being a pathetic regime whore…

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I got a Proton two-year subscription that averages out to two dollars and change per month.

    I already feel like I got an incredible deal.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Too bad the owner of Proton supports Trump, so when my two years subscription ends, I’m moving to Tuta or Posteo

      • Vinstaal0@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Agreeing with a statement from a politician doesn’t mean you support that politician, that’s how compromises can even start.

        But Any Yen isn’t in politics, let alone US politics, he is just an idiot.

        This articles goes a bit more into it, but it is also an opinion. Don’t use Proton if you don’t want to idc: https://medium.com/@ovenplayer/does-proton-really-support-trump-a-deeper-analysis-and-surprising-findings-aed4fee4305e

      • anachrohack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        I moves to proton because I was paying for a vpn, storage, and password manager and it all came out to like ~$45/mo. Proton gives me all that for $30/mo. This was the 3rd password manager I had my family migrate to so I think I’m gonna stick with them for a bit unless I see some kind of evidence that proton is violating the security of its users for governments. I don’t want to have my family have to move to yet ANOTHER password manager

  • fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    It’s not exactly 30%. For sales below $1M, it’s 15%: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/

    In Europe, where this was established last year, they started charging a Core Technology Fee to cover the cost of hosting and data transfer: https://developer.apple.com/support/core-technology-fee/

    And if you switch payment providers, you have to pay at least 2.5% plus transaction and any intermediary fees.

    It’s nice that Proton is offering a discount, but for everyone else there may be additional ongoing costs.

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    No doubt Proton’s CEO will use this to justify his “Trump is better for regulating big tech” claim, while ignoring that the judge is an Obama appointee.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Andy big mad they didn’t invite him to the Inauguration, he should sitting there next to sundar the creep!!!

      And Faceberg and Bezonator