SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 6 days agoBiblical Rulelemmy.worldimagemessage-square84fedilinkarrow-up11.22Karrow-down125
arrow-up11.19Karrow-down1imageBiblical Rulelemmy.worldSoftestSapphic@lemmy.world to 196@lemmy.world · 6 days agomessage-square84fedilink
minus-squaresuperkret@feddit.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up26arrow-down17·6 days agoHuman rights and dignity weren’t on the ballot, though.
minus-squaresurewhynotlem@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down1·5 days agoWe got to choose who we would protest against. We chose poorly.
minus-squarepapertowels@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·5 days agoSure seems like it is if they removed all mention of trans folks from stonewall…
minus-squareSoulg@ani.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·5 days agoMaybe but you had 10/10 denial of rights versus like 5/10 The choice was still obvious.
minus-squarenickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 days agoThey pretty clearly were. Choosing to ignore secondary effects of choices, or being willing to use suffering of vulnerable groups as a means to your end doesn’t change that.
Human rights and dignity weren’t on the ballot, though.
We got to choose who we would protest against. We chose poorly.
Sure seems like it is if they removed all mention of trans folks from stonewall…
Maybe but you had 10/10 denial of rights versus like 5/10
The choice was still obvious.
They pretty clearly were. Choosing to ignore secondary effects of choices, or being willing to use suffering of vulnerable groups as a means to your end doesn’t change that.
They weren’t?