- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
Superuser do? How about soviet worker do?!
mkinitcccpio
We run arch btw
That’s a revolutionary move.
Reformists might
ln /usr /ussr.ln: /usr: hard link not allowed for directoryOh shit, that’s right - it’s a dir. Perhaps
cp -rl /usr /ussrthen? 😂Just do a bind mount?
No no you have it all wrong
No sym links in mother Russia
in soviet russia sym links you
It’s a hard link.
damn you take my upvote
*our upvotes
Makes ideology based changes to a system without regards to consequences
Renders it partially functioning at best, completely inoperable at worst.
At least nobody was purged this time.
Shouldn’t that be a shared folder?
sudo chmod -R 777 /ussr
Could you do that by changing some configs or is this hardcoded too much?
I mean a link would probably work but that’d be
cheatingcapitalism.sudo mkdir /ussr && sudo ln -s /usr /ussr
Or make a FS module that can redirect requests from usr to ussr, and every time it does a redirect it creates a log entry so you troubleshoot and fix the source of the problem.
Then have a cron job that sends the logs daily to both Santa and Putin
I love this idea. Matroiska Linux let’s go
a link, like others said, is the reformist way. we should rebuild the entire kernel to use /ussr instead of /usr because we are revolutionaries
Correct me if I’m wrong but the Linux Kernel itself does not enforce a directory structure at all. It’s the user space (including the init ram image) that mounts the system directories wherever they want them.
Edit: Besides inside mountable system filesystems like sysfs or /proc etc
honestly i have no idea
