- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
You must log in or # to comment.
Superuser do? How about soviet worker do?!
That’s a revolutionary move.
Reformists might
ln /usr /ussr.ln: /usr: hard link not allowed for directoryOh shit, that’s right - it’s a dir. Perhaps
cp -rl /usr /ussrthen? 😂Just do a bind mount?
No no you have it all wrong
No sym links in mother Russia
in soviet russia sym links you
It’s a hard link.
Makes ideology based changes to a system without regards to consequences
Renders it partially functioning at best, completely inoperable at worst.
At least nobody was purged this time.
mkinitcccpio
We run arch btw
damn you take my upvote
*our upvotes
Could you do that by changing some configs or is this hardcoded too much?
I mean a link would probably work but that’d be
cheatingcapitalism.a link, like others said, is the reformist way. we should rebuild the entire kernel to use /ussr instead of /usr because we are revolutionaries
Correct me if I’m wrong but the Linux Kernel itself does not enforce a directory structure at all. It’s the user space (including the init ram image) that mounts the system directories wherever they want them.
Edit: Besides inside mountable system filesystems like sysfs or /proc etc
honestly i have no idea
sudo mkdir /ussr && sudo ln -s /usr /ussr
Or make a FS module that can redirect requests from usr to ussr, and every time it does a redirect it creates a log entry so you troubleshoot and fix the source of the problem.
Then have a cron job that sends the logs daily to both Santa and Putin
I love this idea. Matroiska Linux let’s go
Shouldn’t that be a shared folder?
sudo chmod -R 777 /ussr
