• HootinNHollerin@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      That doesn’t look like it. But very cool! TIL

      It was this I think Fiestaware. After reading about its doses that sounds right. I remember now the meter was 11 mR/hr which on the dosimeter was no longer clicking but pretty solid on.

        • HootinNHollerin@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Thanks for feedback for a sense of severity. If I understand correctly, dosimeter have different time constants and I think this one was pretty cheap/slow, meaning the actual level is higher. The instructions said you have to hold it there for a minute for the reading to be accurate. We didn’t do but 10-15 seconds to get the 11 as I didn’t wanna be around it anymore

          • AmidFuror@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            It was a quote from the TV miniseries Chernobyl. The reading was the highest the dosimeter could measure, so the actual value could have been (and was) much higher. They also underestimated the impact if that reading had been accurate.

    • CmdrShepard42@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I honestly can’t blame them for this because that glass does look pretty sick under a blacklight.