My point is they are putting up views they ascribe to the candidate. It would be better to quote a written or spoken statement.
I guess people can’t figure this out without having it reversed so they can understand it. Imagine a school district in Idaho handing out a lesson to students where they characterized the candidates’ positions thusly:
Abortion Trump: Opposed to baby-killing Harris: Allows baby-killing in most cases.
In theory the candidate supports and has a heavy influence over the party platform.
I read the headline and thought the controversy was probably stupid. Then I read the comparisons.
They should have pulled out planks from the party platforms. At least write what the party says it is going to do in its own words. It’s OK to simplify, but this list is heavily editorialized. I don’t know how much of that was from the NYT article (editorial?) and how much was the teacher’s take.
I think it would be fine to have these characterizations of each party’s policies in Speech & Debate coming from the opponents.
That’s just a nonsensical metric to use to track the impact on young buyers. The fact that it has risen from 49 in the past year means there is something big going on, but what an indirect way to track it!
The median age of first-time buyers also rose from 35 to 38, while the share of first-timers dropped from 32% to 24% of all buyers for the year ending July 2024.
Median is better, and the fraction of first timers is an indicator. Would be best to know the median age of first timers.
That would be immediately banned in China.
Came to the comments and was pleasantly surprised how well genetic drift was represented. People seem to have a much more sophisticated understanding of evolution than 30 years ago.
What’s the opposite of forced abortions? Because given the history of the CCP that could be where this is heading.
Being cartoonish reduces your hit box size.
Take chicken to other side. Return and pick up the fox. Take the chicken back to the starting point and pick up the grain. Leave grain with fox and return for chicken.
Since you can only ever leave the grain and fox together, your hand is forced at every step. The order of the grain and fox is arbitrary.
If they want to do that, just give dirty suicide bombs to their friends in Hamas and Hezbollah.
Next you’ll be telling me the wind turbines in the game cause cancer.
Oh, so you support genocide?
“Immediately” means a tweet or Truth Social post by Trump that is so vague no one under him knows exactly what they’re supposed to do to enact his order.
And then right back to Day 1 dictatorial stuff like imprisoning political opponents and the press.
Great. More fossil fuels destroying the climate and putting billions of people at risk of poverty and displacement.
And don’t get me started on electronic Monopoly!
Just the general over-hyping in the headline. ABOs are hard to make due to instability. Other papers have hinted at ways to create and trap them, and now these authors did so.
Every discovery has to overturn some old rule and have promising applications in life-saving medicines or some such. You can scroll through some more of the gob-smacked headlines from press releases at the bottom of the abstract.
This. That’s why I spend a lot of time riding around on my bicycle in my city, trying to see what’s going on for myself.
Science “news” from university press offices is almost uniformly crap.
Foreign money in US elections is illegal. Is AIPAC money coming from Israel? Seems doubtful, as a lot of money flows from the US to Israel already.
There are a over 48 million African Americans, so does anyone know some insulting words or phrases people use against them?
Then we can move on to the > 60 million Latinos (there will be some overlap).
It’s important to recognize US diversity when dreaming up insults.