not_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agokicking feet rulelemmy.blahaj.zoneexternal-linkmessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1686arrow-down111
arrow-up1675arrow-down1external-linkkicking feet rulelemmy.blahaj.zonenot_IO@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 19 days agomessage-square40fedilink
minus-squareactiv8r@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·18 days agoI wonder if a good lawyer could argue that any jury that finds him guilty are, by definition, not his peers.
minus-squareWraithGear@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-218 days agoI don’t see that working even if the court system hadn’t evolved into an apparatus solely for the enforcement of class strata. His peers are the general public.
I wonder if a good lawyer could argue that any jury that finds him guilty are, by definition, not his peers.
I don’t see that working even if the court system hadn’t evolved into an apparatus solely for the enforcement of class strata. His peers are the general public.