• Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      He reduces harm by not doing whatever trump would be doing if he were elected last election.

      He could be doing more to try and reduce harm or at least least to promote harm, but trump would have made it so much worse.

      Just remember, trump could have been elected in 2020 and been in office the last few years instead while this was all going on. Does anyone think Palestine would be in a better position if that were the case?

      • index@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        16 minutes ago

        You sound in bad faith or unaware of the situation

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Israel_in_the_Israel–Hamas_war

        “The Joe Biden administration stated that Israel would receive “whatever it needs” to support its offensive against the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.”

        I guess “whatever it needs” it’s still better than sending israel atomic bombs or draft every american citizen to go there. Make sure to advertise for them so they can still send israel “whatever it needs” and not for example for a third party that would do what it’s needed to stop the genocide.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          It is in so much as anyone can look at what trump did in his first term, and what the consequences of that term have been. Such as roe

            • GBU_28@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              20
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              None, it’s an abstract to highlight what was (during the trump presidency) and what is (the trump judicial appointment consequences).

              To be closer to Gaza, we can look at the koshoggi assassination inaction, the soleimani assassination, and the infamous “Muslim ban” to gain contextual basis for trump’s expected stance on anything Gaza related.

              There’s lots of rambling talk by trump on the middle east, but as example related to my list, this article describes his opinion of gazans pretty well. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/17/trump-muslim-ban-gaza-refugees

              • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                4 hours ago

                How is that different to what Biden has done in his term? None of those are related to Gaza. Biden has done zero to limit Israel in any way whatsoever. Biden pulled all US troops out of Afghanistan in a clusterfuck of a manner; I don’t think he has done anything to merit saying he’s better than Trump in that regard.

                • GBU_28@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  Did you not make it to the end of my comment?

                  I went from abstract concepts that can inform what we think will happen, to direct examples from the middle east, including his own speech about gazans themselves.

                  We have no indication that trump would deviate from current stance on supporting Israeli or Saudi objectives, including with funding. He did that while he is in office, so funding is a moot point.

                  Though Afghanistan certainly turned into a mess, I think we should be happy we left. The issues for me on that relate to supporters/translators that we should have gotten out. But that’s the cold nature of the MIC and certainly wouldn’t be any different if trump had won. You think trump would care about some “nobody” who got left behind? Obviously not, he’s described American soldiers who die or are captured as losers, so another moot point in my book.

                  • ABCDE@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    2 hours ago

                    We have no indication that trump would deviate from current stance on supporting Israeli or Saudi objectives, including with funding. He did that while he is in office, so funding is a moot point.

                    You can replace that with Biden.

                    Did you not make it to the end of my comment?

                    Yes. From your link:

                    "If you support Hamas or any ideology that’s having to do with that or any of the other really sick thoughts that go through people’s minds – very dangerous thoughts – you’re disqualified.”

                    The quote is talking about Gazans who support Hamas, not Gazans in general.

                    I do not think Afghanistan would have been better under Trump, but Biden is the one responsible for the shitshow.

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      11 hours ago

      26 billion in harm reduction.

      But it’s fine, he’s a Democrat. You are not legally allowed to criticize democrats.