• rumschlumpel@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    Trump is actually second-gen on his mother’s side and third-gen on his father’s side. Not that it really changes the message, but there’s no reason to get the facts wrong in this.

    • banner80@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      Trump is actually second-gen on his mother’s side

      Trump’s mother was born in Scotland. She was a Scottish immigrant and her son is first-generation Scottish-American on her side.

        • banner80@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          Makes sense. Trump’s mother was naturalized as an American citizen in 1942, and D. Trump was born in 1946, and by then his mother already called herself American. That would make her first-gen naturalized American in the eyes of the census, and D. Trump second gen given that he was born to a naturalized immigrant.

          Technicalities aside, Donald Trump was born in America to a person that just a few years earlier called herself Scottish. He should certainly know about the prevalence of immigration in America, between his own Scottish and German background, and marrying immigrants himself.

              • Dasus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                Well yeah, I didn’t mean “all non-US context of immigrants”, but the article especially mentions the US definition being so.

                But that doesn’t mean others can’t also utilise that definition.

                Honestly, I’m not sure who exactly does use the other one, but I know it’s used enough to be acceptable in certain contexts somewhere