• BmeBenji@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Sure, a good, functioning hospital is well-staffed and cares most about the health of its patients. Were the USA a hospital, it would NOT fit that description

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 days ago

      And it won’t get better as long as patients keep going to that hospital.

      Once an emergency (election) is happening, we don’t really have a choice, but when we’re healthy (non elections years) we can organize and protest the hospital, or just build a new one.

      It doesn’t make rational sense to just keep going to that’s ame doctor or ones just as bad over and over again for decades…

      • BmeBenji@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        So would you move all the vulnerable patients to a different hospital? Would you destroy the entire hospital and build it back up while there are patients actively needing care, and loads of people who are vehemently opposed to that? Or would you fix the hospital’s administrative structure without completely destroying it

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 days ago

          I literally just answered that in the comment you replied to when you asked…

          Once an emergency (election) is happening, we don’t really have a choice, but when we’re healthy (non elections years) we can organize and protest the hospital, or just build a new one.