An overdue blog post about the finances and other news from the .world

  • godless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The idea of a non-profit holding sounds great, but what about collateral damage if shit really hit the fan? Would it not be smarter to have a separate entity for each platform? They could all have essentially the same statutes, boards, directors etc. etc., so in case if one really got under heavy fire, the others wouldn’t be affected? I know it means more admin work and probably also requires some governing policies with regards to the funding distribution, but might be cleaner in the end.

    • Obinice@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is absolutely the correct thing to do. Do not place all your eggs in one legal basket.

      • benoit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Won’t that be an administrative nightmare though? N times the number of income tax declarations etc?