…During all this monitoring, I wasn’t anywhere near the rider. I didn’t even need to see them with my own eyes. Instead, I was sitting inside an apartment, following their movements through a feature on a Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) website…

  • krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This is a security flaw for sure, but it’s not nearly as serious as the article makes it out to be. You have to know the person you are targeting, you have to know which credit card they used to pay for their subway credits, and then you have to know the credit card number of that credit card. If you are in a position to know all that, then you are probably already in a position to stalk them using other/superior methods.

    • SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think it’s exactly as big a deal as the article makes it out to be. Think of abusive partners. Transphobic parents. Waiters or bartenders who want to stalk the pretty girl they just checked out.

      I know that the Apple credit card doesn’t have a number printed on it (iirc), and I think some of the payment systems essentially use a unique credit card number per purchase. I’m not sure if those kinds of things would help here.

      But this is both dangerous and absolutely idiotic. Someone came up with an idea, so robe’s manager ram with it without talking to legal or security, and it got pushed live. It should absolutely be pulled.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      there’s long lists of exactly that information available from purchase online. chances are your credit card company is the one selling it.

      And most people don’t have dozens of cards, so they can just run their numbers through…