• Franklin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Batteries are heavy, while weight is a major contributor to road damage (and therefore societal cost) I believe it is more than offset by the reduction in emissions.

    The difference in weight limit helps insure electric sedans aren’t ruled out due to battery weight alone.

    • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Wait, did I phrase things incorrectly maybe? You seem to be just restating what I wrote as if it’s a different point

      • Franklin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 months ago

        It’s a response to your specific point about future imbalance and why this specific law won’t cause that.

        As for your point in taxation of fuel I imagine it will change to additional taxation of energy.

        • usualsuspect191@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          The law specifically causes the imbalance right now though, so now I’m extra confused. It’s not some predicted possible future, it’s about as immediate and direct as it gets. They’ve accounted for the fact the same vehicle as an EV is heavier, which is probably the best way to do this sort of thing as you don’t want to discourage people from switching to greener options. I was pointing out the imbalance and then speculating on what it might mean in the future.

          An extra tax on energy would be one way to do it, although I would personally prefer something directly tied to driving so that people are encouraged to use alternatives when they can.