Alabama is seeking to become the first state to execute a prisoner by making him breathe pure nitrogen.

The Alabama attorney general’s office on Friday asked the state Supreme Court to set an execution date for death row inmate Kenneth Eugene Smith, 58. The court filing indicated Alabama plans to put him to death by nitrogen hypoxia, an execution method that is authorized in three states but has never been used.

Nitrogen hypoxia is caused by forcing the inmate to breathe only nitrogen, depriving them of oxygen and causing them to die. Nitrogen makes up 78% of the air inhaled by humans and is harmless when inhaled with oxygen. While proponents of the new method have theorized it would be painless, opponents have likened it to human experimentation.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      People always think of the innocent person who got off. I get that. But what do you do with somebody who has, say, shot lots of kids in a school?

      Rehab? In what world could we let that person back into society?

      • Vaggumon@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        Never said let them back into society. Knowing you will die in a 6x6 cell, alone, and unwanted by anyone in the whole world is far worse punishment then anything else I can imagine. But killing anyone, regardless of crime, or evidence, makes you just as much of a murderer as anyone convicted of that crime. Also, there is the possibility of killing someone completely innocent, what then? Oops our bad, but we killed 30 other bad people, so this one isn’t a big deal?

        • squiblet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Many people would prefer to be executed vs. being tortured for 50 years in a cell. Others wouldn’t, though. Is it worse to imprison someone innocent for decades or mistakenly execute them? I’m not sure. People could take their choice, perhaps? That’s pretty cruel too though.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Knowing you will die in a 6x6 cell, alone, and unwanted by anyone in the whole world is far worse

          So… Revenge then?

      • Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Is there some reason a prison is incapable of containing them until they die? The only two choices aren’t kill them or let them rejoin society.

        • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I didn’t mean to imply that - but I don’t see how lifetime imprisonment is any more humane. In fact others arguing against the death penalty are saying it’s worse which… Is confusing.

      • TheBananaKing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        If it were your kid in that chair, you wouldn’t give a shit what they’d done, you’d fight with your last breath to save them anyway.

        Who you are doesn’t matter.

        Who they are doesn’t matter.

        Fight to save them.

      • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        because a huge percentage of convicted are later exonerated, and a large percentage that aren’t are posthumously exonerated.

          • bemenaker@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            You can’t have it both ways. I only execute the absolutely guilty and never put someone in jail who is innocent. The world is not black and white. It’s not as simple as you make it out. Innocent people who ere put to death by the criminal.justoce system, at the time we’re beyond a doubt guilty.

          • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Every prosecution team will tell you there is zero doubt until the exoneration, at which point they’ll say “hmm.”

            Also, you say “zero doubt in school shootings” but unlike folk-wisdom, the law actually does care about the minutae of culpability and is exactly the place to get into the distinctions between aforethought, meditation and whether or not they were responsible for their actions.

            • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              We can know they did it regardless of culpability.

              Let’s hypothesize a perfect legal system for sake of argument.