[email protected]@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agoAnon goes apesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square38fedilinkarrow-up1388arrow-down128
arrow-up1360arrow-down1imageAnon goes apesh.itjust.works[email protected]@sh.itjust.works to Greentext@sh.itjust.works · 7 months agomessage-square38fedilink
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up44arrow-down4·edit-27 months agoNo because this is classical operant conditioning not Pavlovian. Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
minus-squareRodeo@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up26·7 months agoPavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
minus-squareDaefsdeda@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up15·7 months agoI think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
minus-squareJokklMaster@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·7 months agoThis is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.
No because this is
classicaloperant conditioning not Pavlovian.Edit: Corrected for my stupid response while exhausted.
Pavlovian conditioning IS classical conditioning: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_conditioning
I think its like every pavlovian is a classical but not every classical is a pavlovian.
This is what happens when I’m posting while exhausted. It’s not Pavlovian/classical, it’s operant conditioning.