• Guildo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nobody will believe it and I got over 100 downvotes. So here you go: China was making liberal changes after Mao and moved away from marxism. The leadership changed and Deng Xiaoping moved ahead to shitty deals for the citizens. Deng openly admitted, that he believed in confucianism and wanted to make changes towards it. A lot of the citizens were unhappy with it and wanted more socialism - which includes more democracy - but also changes to better working-conditions. Because Deng and the new leaders didn’t want that, they moved forward with tanks and military.

      tl:dr: socialists were on the streets and were fought with tanks - the tankies were confucianists, who wanted more capitalism

      • kameecoding@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        tl:dr: socialists were on the streets and were fought with tanks - the tankies were confucianists, who wanted more capitalism

        Damn that was a lot of work indeed. Can’t believe you managed to do it.

        • Guildo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          can’t believe everybody needs to write a stupid comment - there are enough

          • null@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You get what you give. Maybe next time you’ll actually make a coherent point from the outset instead of smugly implying that you know things others won’t believe.

            • Guildo@feddit.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              1 year ago

              I gave links and also an explanation. You can find it with a bit of scrolling.

              • null@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                1 year ago

                You did that well after multiple people dragged it out of you.

                Re-read my comment. I said “from the outset”.

        • WtfEvenIsExistence2️@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Communist Party of China decided they need to become an authoritarian State-Capitalist country survive in the modern world. The protestors still believed in Socialism, but wanted democratic reforms.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        1 year ago

        There may be a grain of truth in that. I’m glad you explained yourself. I definitely appreciate that these things are nor black and white.

        Would you say the protestors wanted more socialism’s but not more Mao-style communism?

        • Guildo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          dno tbh - this whole thing is like a black box and everybody is talking shit - but denying it happened is the dumbest thing to do

          • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            Honestly I’m perfectly happy to discuss what caused Tianenmen and why it happened, I just strenuously object to any implications that it didn’t happen, it was a CIA op, or that the Chinese government was in any way justified in its actions

        • WtfEvenIsExistence2️@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          Basically the protestors were socialists who believed in democracy. The government abandoned socialist ideals and wanted an authoritarian state-capitalist country, but called it “socialism with chinese characteristics”.

          • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah that makes sense. I’ve heard the current system called “fascism with Chinese characteristics” too.

      • WtfEvenIsExistence2️@sopuli.xyzOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes, basically the protestors were socialists who believed in democracy. The government abandoned socialist ideals and wanted an authoritarian state-capitalist country, but called it “socialism with chinese characteristics”.

        • Guildo@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Not democracy like we know it. This is important. They wanted more participation and not voting parties.