• nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    There may be a grain of truth in that. I’m glad you explained yourself. I definitely appreciate that these things are nor black and white.

    Would you say the protestors wanted more socialism’s but not more Mao-style communism?

    • Guildo@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      dno tbh - this whole thing is like a black box and everybody is talking shit - but denying it happened is the dumbest thing to do

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly I’m perfectly happy to discuss what caused Tianenmen and why it happened, I just strenuously object to any implications that it didn’t happen, it was a CIA op, or that the Chinese government was in any way justified in its actions

    • WtfEvenIsExistence2️@sopuli.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Basically the protestors were socialists who believed in democracy. The government abandoned socialist ideals and wanted an authoritarian state-capitalist country, but called it “socialism with chinese characteristics”.

      • nomadjoanne@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah that makes sense. I’ve heard the current system called “fascism with Chinese characteristics” too.