• biddy@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Transport is not an obsession, it’s a basic necessity. It’s a huge deal regardless of what mode. But I think your point with cars is that there are alternatives that don’t cause as much harm. I can think of a few other similar examples.

    Housing - Suburban housing. It’s worse than cars in many of the ways you outlined. Typically cars and suburbs come as a double punch.

    Food - Meat. At least as damaging to the environment as cars, causes huge amounts of suffering, and it’s also pointless because there are great alternatives.

    Cooking - Gas stoves. Fairly minor, but there’s no good reason they should still exist. Same story with gas heaters instead of heat pumps.

    • LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Suburban sprawl I would consider to be part of the same issue—it’s development that is warped around the primacy of the automobile.

      Meat is a good example of something that comes close though. Certainly a lot of problems associated with meat production. But I think I would say that is a condemnation of meat culture, not a defense of car culture.

      Gas appliances are a problem but so much more minor than the car. And we’re far from having the same obsession with them as we do with cars. I think they will disappear in coming years and few people will even miss them.