Abortion has been on the ballot in seven states since June 2022. In each instance, anti-abortion groups have lost.

    • BigNote@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Not at all. The majority opinion in Dodd clearly states that the issue should be decided at the state level, so even if a case somehow did make it to the SC, they would almost certainly decline to hear it since the matter, as far as they’re concerned, is already settled. In that event the last ruling stands and cannot be further appealed.

      • dynamojoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        they would almost certainly decline to hear it

        I remember when Roe was “settled law”, too. They’ll hear whatever they want if it lets them achieve their political goals. Remember that at least one Justice (Thomas?) was on record basically asking for more abortion cases to get to the SC so they could decide on them. He got his wish.

      • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s how it SHOULD work. But the SC has given up almost every shred of impartiality.

    • Kethal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      The supreme court doesn’t make laws. Congress can protect abortion rights. Obviously elections determine the make up of Congress, but ultimately they determine who is on the supreme court too. If Trump weren’t elected, protections provided by RvW would have been secure for decades.

      • Clickrack@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 year ago

        The supreme court doesn’t make laws.

        With their overturning Roe, completely ignoring precedent and redefining “standing” to include hypothetical fantasies (ala, the Web ‘designer’ Lorie Smith who never was asked to create a LGBTQ+ wedding website, but “might have to someday”), they are indeed making laws.