kalkulat@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoUS judge rules: if you can't prove damages, car-makers can continue to intercept and record customers' mobile phone activity.therecord.mediaexternal-linkmessage-square71fedilinkarrow-up1269arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1264arrow-down1external-linkUS judge rules: if you can't prove damages, car-makers can continue to intercept and record customers' mobile phone activity.therecord.mediakalkulat@lemmy.world to Selfhosted@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square71fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareMaggoty@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agoSure except under this logic there’s no injury to someone peering through your windows. After all they didn’t do anything else…
minus-squarebastion@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agoNice take. I myself am fine with the ruling, but only if we get a full-ownership deal on the car, and can legally completely gut and replace parts that do that. Also, the car should be sold with a warning label regarding these issues.
Sure except under this logic there’s no injury to someone peering through your windows. After all they didn’t do anything else…
Nice take.
I myself am fine with the ruling, but only if we get a full-ownership deal on the car, and can legally completely gut and replace parts that do that. Also, the car should be sold with a warning label regarding these issues.