• 1 Post
  • 1.1K Comments
Joined 11 months ago
cake
Cake day: July 31st, 2023

help-circle
  • But if the real world sets up a simulated world which more or less perfectly simulates itself

    This is the crux of the logical error you made. It’s a common error, but it’s important to recognize here.

    If we’re in a simulation, we have no idea the available resources in the simulation “above” us. Suppose energy density up there is 100x as high as ours?Suppose the subjective experience of the passage of time up there is 100x faster than ours?

    Another thing is that we have no idea how long it takes to render each frame of our simulation. Could take a million years. As long as it keeps running though, and as long as the simulation above us is patient, we keep ticking. This is also where the subjective experience of time matters. If it takes a million years, but their subjective “day” is a trillion years long, it becomes feasible to run us for a while.

    And, finally, there’s no reason to assume we’re a complete simulation of anything. Perhaps the simulation was instantiated beginning with this morning–but including all memories and documentation of our “historical” past. All that past, all that experience is also fake, but we’d never know that because it’s real to us. In this scenario, the simulation above us only has to simulate one day. Or maybe even just the experiences of one PERSON for one day. Or one minute. Who knows?

    The main point is we don’t know what’s happening in the simulation above ours, if it exists, but there’s no reason to assume it’s similar to ours in any way.











  • Tangentially, is “bastard” gendered? It feels like it’s always applied to men, so it seems gendered. And yet, the original meaning of the word “bastard”–someone born out of wedlock–doesn’t imply any kind of gender.

    So it struck me as weird that this person would call themselves a bastard. nbd, just thought it was odd






  • To sum up: we recently got the awesome FTC instruction that noncompete agreements are disallowed in almost all cases.

    Noncompete agreements keep workers from being able to work in their trained field just because they previously worked somewhere else in that field and had to sign a paper to do so. They’re a tool used to harm worker power; traditionally for knowledge workers, but now it’s being used all over the place.

    The judge SC said, you can’t ban those. Noncompetes are cool and good. Fuck workers.

    EDIT: This was a 5th circuit judge, so not the USSC. A little below that level.