This is the type of argument I expect to see on Facebook by their mostly uneducated crowds. But here on Lemmy? I thought we were a bit better than that and more rational…

These are completely independent scenarios, with different funding streams, with different problems, solutions and so on.

Yes yes go read my other comments.

If you read my other comments you’ll see that I defend exactly what you said …

Yes I think we both agree with that. It was a misinterpretation on my part of OP arguments: no charging at all vs charging students

but a society which levels the financial burden on the student is imposing an artificial and indefensible barrier on their collective progress.

I absolutely agree with this.

Finally, taxes don’t pay for anything when the funding originates from the issuing entity of a fiat currency.

Not sure I understand your point

A society which charges students to acquire knowledge values neither.

Because this is literally what he said. He never mentioned sports, just charging in general.

I understand his sentiment, but it’s not practical.

Read my comment again, you entirely missed my point: I want to think about it as paying it for others. I’m all for it I’ll gladly pay taxes to allow others to go study, it’s one of the things I’ll defend fiercely. An educated society is a better one

What I meant is someone has to pay for it, it’s not free lunch. You’re right that the students don’t pay it through taxes, but someone has to. Myself as a working person do pay for others through taxes

Edit: as people seem to have failed to see my point: I’m glad my taxes help pay for other’s studies

That seems like an Utopian view you’re not paying for the knowledge but for the resources to learn and accreditation. Universities, professors, etc don’t pay for themselves. Even when University is “free” you are paying it through taxes - which is still fine by me.

I don’t agree, though, with the prices practiced in the US, that’s just a way of restraining the population. Where I’m from, going to college is not expensive, I cannot fathom having to pay those ridiculous prices.

I bought CLion’s license for many years for personal use. I could easily work on c++ and python on the same project, and could still use it for Rust (same project or not). I decided to stop with the license when they deprecated Rust’s plugin in favor of RustRover. I don’t like jumping around between “different” IDEs.

So someone who wrote their own functional operating system and browser from scratch which he is now targeting the public with, is not comfortable learning something new?

You are all assuming that the project will be c++ only when the authors haven’t said anything about the matter. Who knows if they aren’t open to moving to rust? The project is originally in c++, not only but, because that’s what the target OS supported. There are examples of other browser moving from c++ to rust (Firefox) who says they can’t do the same?

Let’s be honest, we both were childish :)

English is not my first language. I saw the mistake and left it here. You fixated on that simple mistake instead of answering the main point

I’m not sure 10 years old are allowed on the internet. Isn’t it time for Coco and bed?

I agree that Rust would be an interesting choice for this project but there’s a reason why this particular project is done in C++

I don’t buy that at all. If you read about Apollo, and before that, you’ll see that simply this stuff is hard and many times you have things “half-assed” and just take the risk. Another case is the Space Shuttle…

With that said I think Boeing has been too unreliable for manned space flight. I don’t trust much the “we’re just taking time to gather more data” and this to me is the bad part about private companies: they have no compulsion to be truthful to the public.

What are you on about? Yes they made sure their gadgets were easy to use, but Apple and Jobs were the pinnacle of “locking you in” on their ecosystem for the profit of it. Sure they weren’t as careless about users when compared to Microsoft but they weren’t too favourable of you using anything else. They invented this stuff.

Yes exactly. These companies hold rights for far too long in the hopes they can “milk that cow” at any chance they have. The products of these (and many others) companies are electronic waste for many after a while and so normal copyright laws shouldn’t hold for them, it’s just too wasteful.

That’s because these consoles and source code are not always compatible. To make them it would cost them time, money and the compromise to maintain them.

I would rather these companies to be forced to open source their older hardware and source code, so the community could do something with them and not have all the hardware laid to waste. Or at least support the development of emulators

What do you even mean as serious contender? I’ve been using Linux for almost 15 years without an issue on CPU, and I’ve used it almost only on very modest machines. I feel we’re not getting your whole story here.

On the other hand whenever I had to do something IO intensive on windows it would always crawl in these machines

Great, I’ll be a bit absolute and say that if a corporation doesn’t want to use my GPL code I see it as a good thing, corporations tend to be soulless leeches.