wholookshere

Violation of what specifically?

Because HIPAA does not say you cant store data with third parties. That would be every cloud EMR out there.

That’s my point though. Is HIPAA says nothing technical about who can store data, just who’s responsible for it getting out.

I’m also required to be compliant.

But how can companies like google have products like

https://cloud.google.com/security/compliance/hipaa

if cloud storage is a violation?

I’m not op, and I’ve Read the actual law.

Fun fact, the law actually does not lay out a single technical “must do”.

But rather establish liabilities and defines miss use. Which is NOT the same as proper use.

Yes, but you talked about how cloud storage vs on prem is a violation.

Put up or shut up.

Also see my edit about a BAA

Legally, any organization that used this service would be opening themselves to further liability under HIPAA.

What legal violation? Because the law says nothing about that.

what the law does allow, is data storage with a BAA.

can you site the part of HIPAA that says that?

There’s no certification for HIPAA defined in law.

do not feed the troll

because why else make changes to something not broken? I haven’t heard any big cases for locking down side loading.

broader context, google is slowly killing ASOP. they’re slowly closing its source, changing what made android great to a lot of people. They’ve started by only releasing source code on release.

on another note to other readers.

this reaks of astortufing. new account, and heavy belief in the good of corporations.

also

its a corp it can’t just make claims and not follow on them.

counter point. Apple in the announcement said that iMesaage would be an open platform. where did that go?

they can and do lie. all the fucking time

Totally on that page with you.

But there’s a lot of people who will come say that, but only comment on China related calls, which reaks of “all lives matter” level of disingenuous.

I’ll bite.

How often do you comment that on non Chinese cars?

Thank you for coming with more sources.

What do you think an intentional leak is?

No your point is that your trying to be the loudest voice.

All you have are insults instead of anything of substance.

Have the day you deserve.

The last section specifically calls out an apple example

Provoking, the fourth type of leak, involves companies leaking truthful information in the hopes of obtaining useful information. In “How Apple Does Controlled Leaks” John Martellaro suggests that before launching the iPad, Apple may have released tablet information early for several reasons including wanting to gauge reaction to a US$1,000 price point; to panic or confuse competitors; or to whet analyst expectations. Hannah et al. caution that provoking could backfire if affected parties act on information they assume to be final but that subsequently turns out not to be, negatively affecting a company’s reputation.

Source in article

https://www.huffpost.com/archive/ca/entry/the-art-of-deliberately-leaking-corporate-secrets_b_8743858

No, it starts months before with teases and leaks.

Also like, you agree you knew what was in the envelope, you think that was an accident?

Do you have something to say there wasn’t planning? Because that’s your claim with 0 evidence, which beats their something.

Okay, but can you see how that’s not actually what you said?

You just called it stupid.

But with hindsight, do you think that carrier deployment unrelated?

Because if it is, then some planning went into it.

do you really think marketing starts at a launch? people have to know what’s going to be announced to be excited to watch.

of course leaks are a part of that.