Pennomi

Play the Britannica Octordle instead? https://www.britannica.com/games/octordle/

The problem is that a judge, by virtue of being human, is incapable of impartiality.

If there were some sort of computer code that turned the legal system into a hard science that would be amazing, but I doubt that’s even possible.

Gay marriage is mostly decided in the US, despite Republican bluster and Democrat worry. It is strongly supported by both parties, and while more radical Republicans are in power now, it’s quite unlikely it will change.

The policies at critical danger in the next four years are abortion, trans rights, and immigrant rights.

A good deal of the miracles happen conveniently off-screen, and mostly become “true” because the whole group tends to unanimously trust the mythos.

Saw one of these in the wild last weekend.

This is a particularly difficult situation to give advice on because it could be totally harmless or completely dangerous, depending on the details.

You’re probably best talking to a therapist or other highly trusted individual who knows the specifics of the situation instead of random internet strangers.

I think the first two episodes were mediocre, the rest of the season was fantastic. Maybe give it a shot!

The latest season almost feels like a return to form. Nearly all the episodes were excellent.

Wrong. The only viable way to fix this is to vote for Kamala today to avoid further genocide, and then for candidates who support RCV in all the downballot elections. That builds support for a proper election format at a local, then state, then national level.

It’s not a trolley problem if you aren’t given a choice to pull the lever. There is no viable candidate who fights against super pacs.

It’s not hard to max out when doing simulations in Blender, but I know I have a niche use case.

The problem with this is always cost. That looks just as expensive to fire, if not moreso, than the drone it shoots down.

Me too. High five! (But not like, in person. Because I’m not leaving my house.)

Don’t kinkshame

Agreed. The aggressive depth of field is another smoking gun that usually indicates an AI image.

I mean, yeah it’s hypocritical, he has several sexual harassment lawsuits open against him IIRC.

That being said, in your example, it would be Mormons criticizing Mormons for their belief, not ex-Mormons criticizing ex-Mormons.

It’s never wrong to speak the truth, even if you’re on the wrong side of it.

I guess I didn’t explain very well. Basically there are some things which are still impossible even if you change the rules. This remains true even beyond full control of the properties of the universe.

Yeah, there are literally thousands of legitimate reasons to hate Musk. Calling out former friends for their behavior… isn’t really one of them.

Instead hate him because he’s actively promoting discrimination against trans people, or because he’s eroding democracy through illegal lotteries, or because he regularly manipulates the stock market, or pushing the great replacement theory, or…

Right, but 1+1 still cannot equal to 3 in that video game. You could do all kinds of horrible tricks to make it seem so, but they are just that - tricks.

Paradoxes are by definition impossible, even in a modified version of physics.

I mean, it could be a manual photoshop job. Just because it’s not AI doesn’t mean it’s real.

But also the detector is probably wrong - it’s likely an AI image using a different model than the detector was trained to detect.