Well, I’m sorry to say, but almost everybody has better passenger rail than the US.

They have a great taste, but they are much more soft and less chewy than the “original”. Tasty but not exactly a drop-in replacement for some.

On the topic of fatigue: They to eat enough. It sounds silly, but you burn quite some calories while riding a bike and you will need to fuel yourself. Have something with carbs after the ride or even a snack during. You will also get used to it more and more over time. The first rides are always the hardest.

And it might really not be possible in the place where you live, but prefer smaller paths/roads over the main roads. It might add a couple of km to your ride but you will reach your destination much more relaxed.

Wish you all the best.

The sockets look similar to Mill-Max Headers & Sockets. They could be bought at various electronic component outlets. However, the original MillMax are a bit expensive.

True. My hair has never been better.

Do you then ONLY wash the with water or do you wash them with something special from time to time? I use a little hair soap and apple vinegar maybe once a week, as they still tend to get a little “heavy” after days with just rinsing them with water.

Normally, the isn’t a dedicated FW for right&left. There is just one FW for both and you flash that to both halves. The KB determines which side is right and which is left by either the half the USB cable is connected to ( e.g. FW is configured with “USB half is right side”) or by flashing a small marker to the EEPROM of the controllers to mark them as right/left (this marker us not part of the FW, look for EE_HANDS in the QMK docs).

Flashing with the .uf2 file provided by the webpage, you should get the default behavior of the keyboard and it should generally be working.

If you want to change any behavior (like key layout or anything) you would need to flash the halves with your own config of QMK anyways. That is kind of the neat thing about custom KBs - you can configure your device to your liking.

Since all my suggestions were already mentioned here, I will ask a kind of off-topic question: Why are looking into “protein” ingredients specifically? So what are you looking for / trying to achieve with protein intake?

I’d say that this a weird way to put it. We just have too few other sustainable plants - mainly wind - in our mix.

If I use my two fingers on the elevation widget, I can “zoom in and out” and it will show me the corresponding section of the track in the map.

For me, that is the same behavior as with previous versions.

The moment I see “web3” it’s a scam in my eyes.

https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/

https://www.web3isgoinggreat.com/

If you need some inspiration on existing boards: https://golem.hu/board/ --> set the filter on “ortholinear” for “matrix style” boards.

First you need to find a board, then we can help you to build it.

(You COULD build a board from scratch, but if you have not built a board yet, or have no background in mech. / electr. engineering, this me a bit too much at first.)

I mostly use OsmAnd for everything.

Also https://www.opencyclemap.org/ is nice if you want to find bicycle paths.

Another nice tool is https://www.komoot.com as it has a lot of features for planning (longer) trips by foot or bike.

I also like BRouter - e.g. https://brouter.m11n.de . There other versions of this with different settings and languages.

I think all of them are based on OSM data, but they augment them in various ways.

Come join the Matrix! The water is fine. 😎

While the whole world is beeing like

Removed by mod

Is it weird

No. You’re fine.

VNC

Well put me in a dress and call me Sheryl. Never knew that the “accepted definitions” were really that close. Thanks!

I knew that some definitions of OSS were really basic (as in “as long as there is source at some point”) but I didn’t know that the OSI definition was so close to the idea of “free software”.

I found the read about the history and similarities & differences quite interesting: https://web.archive.org/web/20180915200609/http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html

I think you got that one wrong.

Open source is not a license. Open source literally just means that the source is openly available. It does not include the right for you to reuse or change any of the source.

That’s why most of the time, people are talking about “Free Open Source Software” (FOSS) when they think of openly licensed source code.

That’s why you can publish your project on e.g. Github (= open source) but if you don’t add a license statement, your work is still protected by an “all rights reserved copyright”. (= not free)

Anyhow, I would not necessarily deem a project OSS, just because the used language is readable by default. To me, OSS needs at least the developers intention to make it openly available.