Where’s my water is a water physics game that’s been around for a long time.

I understand your point, but that’s what this law would theoritcally accomplish. It would limit representatives/senators from being able to trade stocks (a higher standard than an average citizen). While they can buy/sell stocks before the law, that’s just the current state of affairs.

Regarding the timing of trades, etc. The value of their insider knowledge is really only beneficial over long periods of time. Yes they could buy/sell stock in the interim, but preventing it long term would be an actual win.

That’s how laws work. You can’t generally make something illegal retroactively, otherwise you could change the law to persecute anyone you want.

How would you want them to approach it?

“Required” might not be the right word, but here’s an article about how the San Fransico Trains are updated via floppies - https://www.wired.com/story/san-francisco-muni-trains-floppy-disks/

In the US at least it’s not about required, but more legacy support. There are still a lot of old systems that work, but use old technology.

That’s an apples to oranges comparison. Self driving cars aren’t driving on the same roads and in the same conditions. Maybe they’re better, but that hasn’t really been tested/evaluated.

Look into online banks like Ally or credit unions. I’m 99%sure that Ally has no minimum requirement and about a 4% interest rate for money in your savings account.

Yeah, I saw a couple of people mention Hollow Knight and was confused, it’s not a rougelite/like game at all, just straight-up Metroidvania.

Rouge Legacy 1 & 2 are both great rougelite games.

Yeah, I don’t imagine some of the online banks changing their operations, as places like Ally already provide a lot of cover for things like overdraft.

In that scenario it becomes another reason to not do business with JP.

Maybe to some, but certainly not everyone.

Not basically, most (current) recommendation systems are AI/ML based. Any big platform is using AI/ML recommendation algorithms.

Yeah, that’s what sold me on it. It was just fun from beginning to end, only issue was that there was one boss that really spiked in difficulty. Otherwise I think it’s a game that knew exactly what it wanted to do and executed it really well.

No, you actually use the drill to sorta “swim” through the ground, but when you breach the surface you carry your momentum. So a lot of the gameplay is finding how to hop from area to area. What makes it challenging is that once you start digging you can’t stop until you breach the surface, so some areas (kinda like in Celeste) you are quickly navigating from platform to platform in quick succession.

I’d what the videos on the link if you want a better visual.

If you’ve ever wanted to reenact famous sword fights from Princess Bride or Zorro, the you should try En Garde. It’s short (probably 3-4 hours for the main story). But the fencing/gameplay is fun.

I wouldn’t recommend at $20, but it’s half off and I thought worth the $10 price tag.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1654660/En_Garde/

Another fun, but short game I’d recommend is Pepper Grinder. Fun platformer with an interesting gimmick.

https://store.steampowered.com/app/2076580/Pepper_Grinder/

If you’re talking about the US, they certainly aren’t punching hard enough then. Trump is an extremist and basically leading right wing politics.

I get why you’re getting down voted, but also at the same time Obama did drone strike a US citizen https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Abdulrahman_al-Awlaki

Yeah, Tunic is a great game. I’ve also heard Return to the Obra Dinn is supposed to be similar.

I think the argument is that as less people have desktops and laptops, the only people left will be more technical (otherwise they’d just use a phone or tablet). The more technical people are also likely to use Linux. So as non-technical people move to tablets and phones, technical people make up a larger share of laptop/desktop users.

Yeah, this is an American politics problem, it’s not exclusive to the Democrats. Should at least add Trump and Mitch McConnell on there.

Wasn’t aware of that, I was just taking a guess.

That being said I wouldn’t consider either open given those restrictions.

Since there is a user acceptance policy that restricts what you can do with the model that might be considered “partially” open.

Yeah you can see the weights, but it seems you are limited on what you can do with the weights. How we’ve gotten to the point you can protect these random numbers that I’ve shared with you through a UA is beyond me.