Based on a false premise, Harris was universally unpopular with women and minorities and everyone else. Maybe that should just tell you that universally unpopular candidates are unpopular candidates and not their characteristics?

Just because someone is a woman or minority does not mean that women or minorities will support them. Frankly it is rather insulting that you think it would.

When you kick that horse in front of the gift when it is trying to drink you do.

Cynical posturing, same as hochul, but hochul’s endorsement actually meams something as governor.

We should not talk about kamala or biden or anyone that forced them or hillary on us unless is to demand their ousters.

Why is this news? She is not an elected official. She never breached 30% approval rating as vice president before her anointation.

Scotus willl find a way to cancel that. Probably also make it so the lower courts are unable to make any such determinations in the first place like they did with forbidden courts from issuing Nationwide injunctions, leaving us all at the absolute mercy of the executive branch in effect.

People do not realize how big of a decision that was, perhaps the worst the Supreme Court has ever made.

I will take your revised history under consideration, I read about this in history books so that consideration means little to me given all of the other revisionist history I have seen like rehabilitating history’s worst monsters rehabilitating feudalism.

Often for wealthy benefactors with an ax to grind or paying academics to prove over and over that the New Deal made things worse are you okay? Intellectual looking front that lawmakers can wave around when making changes after they are paid to do so.

Reality is under assault from every angle and reality is losing.

Or the hundreds of history books it is written in, I don’t know what your recent iteration of Wikipedia says, But that has been the history, you are the first person I have ever heard challenging it. If that is something that you got off of a recent Wikipedia edit, I would not be surprised there is some new form of revisionism going on.

That is not a piece of history that has ever been up for debate that I have seen, nor one that the Soviets have tried to hide or Russians have tried to deny. It was trotsky’s idea, and in the Ukraine war they may have dusted it off to some degree.

So I don’t know where you are getting that from but they absolutely were known for shooting anybody that retreated from their position no matter what the circumstance. They lost 17 million people.

But our courts now are so fucked that the lawyers will argue while it is cruel, it is not unusual because we are doing it all the time so therefore both of the terms of cruel and unusual aren’t met and the court has no business stepping in the way of our legitimate executive Authority.

Disallowing courts from Nationwide injunctions was a huge decision that is not recognized as such yet, that shows you where the Supreme Court is going to allow this to go, straight into the abyss. They think the Republic is already dead and all but name.

Once America got involved it was over for Germany. There is no scenario where Germany could have won with the US involved. Just fighting France and England and Russia they absolutely would have won. Could have anyway. How many people did the Russians sacrifice to get rid of the Germans, 17 million? Guys behind the lines to shoot anybody that Retreats from their position for any reason.

A sign that people don’t think they have a way to fight. We don’t have any leadership, fighting under the Democrats is a waste of time that sticks your neck out without accomplishing anything. You get some real leadership and you will get fight. Until you get rid of these Democrats that see themselves as controlled opposition this is what you will get.

Well I’m glad that being disagreeable to everyone as a matter of course is working out for you. As long as you’re happy that’s what’s important. Don’t worry about the fact that you’re giving everybody else fighting for the same things a bad name.

Guilt by association. You could definitely be sent to prison for it. Cheering on charging family members of people is beyond ignorant. It is something they have started to do though, the feds. Very unchristian.

Guilt by association. But you liked a post from a guy that celebrated Charlie Kirk’s assassination so therefore hate crime charges for you pal. Do you see why that’s a bad idea?

Unfortunately bad faith bigot accusations abound and lessen the effect of real bigotry allegations.

Almost everybody has been falsely accused of bigotry by some person dishonestly stroking off their outrage boner pretending they meant something they didn’t, so the real accusations cannot be distinguished from the fake ones.

The people that do this, this is just the excuse they can use to beat up on someone. If they were on the right they would use whatever excuse would allow them there. They don’t actually give a shit, they want to attack somebody and will not be bothered getting a Justified situation for it.

Here we are losing the country and the culture, and we are in fighting defending from bad faith the bigotry allegations from our supposed allies. Our undercover enemies pretending to be us would be well suited to spearhead those attacks however.

I bet they went through all the messaging of prigozin and everybody else through what they thought were secure messaging channels and that could be part of this, that is pure conjecture.

My point is I believe the boss is paranoid and searching and lashing out at anyone he suspects of disloyalty.

The guardian podcast said differently, randomly arresting people for terror for peotesting the issue no mention of the proscribed.

Why are you repudiating the podcasy?