Or they are pumping George’s tires

Maybe he was hired by an event running AI chatbot

https://www.decisionproblem.com/paperclips/

Also true if he is talking about Joy the character from Pixar’s Inside Out

Yep, just redirecting tax money into private pockets and then slowly increasing the cost.

or an “engine wanted”

It was above the rim Jerry!

What if he leaves because Red Bull was trying to cover it up last year?

They have changed the order of sprint weekend for 2024. No confirmation on if they will move parc ferme but seems more doable now with the main quali taking place after the sprint race

Think the biggest issue with sprint for me was the parc ferme happening after one practice session. I think they should try letting teams change the setup based on data gathered in the sprint

So how does this work with budgets, wind tunnel time, and regulations? Does the FIA send people ahead of entry to monitor things?

And they know the rules will never apply to them anyway even if they get caught. Win win

Be Right Back

Might be onto something there hehe

And it still breaks a box office record

From early in the season:

“ The Mercedes specification is bulkier in the area closest to the floor, which limits airflow through the AMR23’s diffuser. This area is designed for a car with ultra-compact bodywork like the W14, as seen with the Mercedes ‘zeropods.’

Having a less efficient diffuser means the AMR23 needs more rear wing to compensate, which generates more drag.”

https://formu1a.uno/en/how-the-mercedes-gearbox-has-slowed-down-aston-martin/

I think what makes it a recall is that the NHTSA points out a fault and requires the manufacturer to fix it. It just happens that Tesla has the ability to use OTA updates. So not sure there is a difference in severity just because a fix is software.

But it does raise the question for me if it’s a simple software fix why did Tesla wait for the NHTSA? Don’t they have tons of live diagnostic data from their cars?

That’s a whole lot of energy spent based on completely incorrect assumptions about me or what I was saying so your argument can work. But sure whatever makes you feel like you are right.

I assume EU has safety regulations and if a train suddenly loses its brakes they would be liable wouldn’t they? Now they can say someone has “hacked the train” and they can’t guarantee the brakes will work. I am not sure where the USA argument came from

Sadly they will probably win this as well. Some claim there could safety concerns and it isn’t certified or could damage their brand… time for people’s manufacturing of products? Hehe