Antisemitism, the Holocaust, genocide…these terms are often used as a political, argumentative weapon. I am pretty sure you‘d say the same thing. But, I think according to your definition of the Holocaust it, you’d like to use it as a weapon, too. Because your historical reference is not only wrong, it is upside down.

It wasn‘t that easy to find the historical evolution of the term, but I think the Oxford dictionary explains it best:

historical. Usually with capital initial and with the. The systematic mass killing of Jews under the German Nazi regime in Nazi-controlled areas of Europe between 1941 and 1945. Later also in extended use with reference to other victims of Nazi genocide, such as Romani people, gay people, or people with disabilities. The term The Holocaust began to be applied specifically in this sense by Jewish historians in the 1950s…

This is pretty much what I read elsewhere. In Germany nobody talked about The Holocaust at all till the late 60s. Only slowly society allowed to speak about German atrocities. Since then the term is mostly, in Germany exclusively, used to describe the killing of Jews by the Nazi regime.

And then, only in the 90s the Sinti and Roma, Slavic and homosexual victims were recognised, too.

This chronology disproves the point you want to make: That the Holocaust is a propaganda trope only useful to the Israeli government.

In the end you hijack the term holocaust denier and label Jews with it. You should think that through again.

Ah, that‘s a shame.

In what way do see him denying the holocaust? He does confirm it was a singular event

Way to go shitting all over someone trying to give a nuanced take. You completely lost it here, and for what? For your right (or pleasure) to equate Israelis to Nazis? Well done.

luckily we have laws and enforcement for all sorts of crimes.

Can we avoid the fascists‘ marketplace, please?

ah, they‘re like Teddy Boys

Only the Freikorps went after Socialists, here the police isn‘t supposed to stop the Left but the Right. Also interesting but different. Ah, and I don‘t think the Freikorps were driven by the economic collapse as much as the Social Democrats.

Europe reneging atm

who is that?

Ah, but in 8 years Russia is going to attack NATO countries I keep hearing here in the EU

yeah, let‘s not fall for this tankie narrative. It doesn‘t exist.

this war has been going on for 10 years now. do you think more people should die for…again, what?

How about a peace treaty with western countries giving real guarantees to Ukraine instead of trying to weaken Russia by proxy, aka the Ukrainian population, providing lacklustre military support.

I just want to know if Corbyn would volunteer for the front-line should Russia simply regroup following a ceasefire and attack again.

Ugh, embarrassing take. Do you think somebody talking about ending a war is betraying…yeah, what again?

OMG, China!

BS

Oh man, speaking of rhetorical devices…

Well, if you are calling for people not to engage with these groups, then you are compliant in creating these echo chambers. Yours and theirs. This is what happened with the disenfranchised people at The_Donald. Framing them like idiots, with some collective nefarious goal is laughable at best. While you don’t approve the way they communicate, they are still pretty good at exposing liberal hypocrisy. If you pretend that doesn’t exist and just want to shut up growing factions of society, you are working against your self interest all the same.

What does it mean: they got a 100% ousting of all candidates…? I am not a native speaker. Who is they?

so what are you saying? the majority of US voters forced the government to support the Gaza genocide?

and if not? are we already living the alternative?