![](https://hexbear.net/pictrs/image/8efd114f-7129-4d18-ad24-81fdac42bb14.jpeg)
![](https://lemmy.zip/pictrs/image/77ad0608-acf8-4508-bf30-fb3df37c6bac.webp)
She lets Triss escape though, font of goodwill that she is.
better than Triss deserves to be fair
She lets Triss escape though, font of goodwill that she is.
better than Triss deserves to be fair
Hexbear says no being horny for cops, be they bunny or kitty
I just looked up the elephant vs mouse segment. The way the elephants reacted, I kinda feel like they’re being cautious because they recognize a harmless lil animal and don’t want to step on it. Like they behave pretty much exactly how I do when I see a little spider or frog or cricket or something. like “whoa there buddy, you dont wanna be under my feet”
If you write something, you own the copyright, period. There’s no registration process or anything like that. If you made it, it’s yours, legally. And the only process involved to exercise your legal rights would just be proving that you’re actually the one who made it.
Of course, none of that makes it certain that no one will claim it as their own or use it for something you don’t want. As a general rule, just assume that anything you don’t want used in a way you don’t like simply shouldn’t be put out into the public at all, regardless of what kind of license you package with it. If you’re an average person and not a billionaire good luck exercising any kind of legal rights for intangible stuff like written words.
It is generally a good idea to include with anything you put out there some kind of license, which could be as simple as a .txt file that says “Made by [name], free to use for xyz purposes with abc caveats”
For a book stuff like that can go into the first or last couple pages that usually include all sorts of random boring information and publisher credits and whatnot
I read all my books on the clock
the artists still exist and would continue to make art even if we abolished the systems of exploitation we apply to that art.
frankly, art would instantly become far better without capitalism weighing it down
Just keep in mind that hard drives do not last forever. They’ll last a few years of regular use, maybe up to a decade if you’re lucky. Storing media on a hard drive is not like having a box of books in your basement, your kids aren’t going to be able to use them in 40 years.
It was only a matter of time before Google put their foot down and insisted that you can’t have a good experience on YouTube. Its time is coming.
i love hearing about this kinda thing, im sure your kid will be glad to have grown up this way once she’s got the hang of it :)
depends whether you like livestreaming. ignoring the poor likelihood of getting to the point where you can do it as a job, it’s essentially like being a comedian or a talk show host or whatever except you can just up and do your job whenever and wherever you feel like no exceptions. you don’t have to have a specific schedule and you don’t have to convince anyone that you’re worth hosting. you just boot up the stream and some weirdos show up and throw money at you to acknowledge their existence.
now, if we stop ignoring the likelihood of getting to the point where you can do it as a job… it’s very very unlikely. if you’re not already at least “internet famous” and you decide you want to be a streamer for a living, you essentially have to go out there and manufacture internet fame / some kind of viral effect
the one run by a cult??? laundering money??? no way
Sounds like littering, being a public nuisance, negligence, endangerment of everybody on that road, uhhhh idk probably a bunch of other shit i could come up with if i were a prosecutor
get em
if the pilot survived they should be charged with whatever the fuck id be charged with if i went and set an entire hillside on fire
you know who this asian man reminds me of? yellow cartoon character. how is that racist btw?
you came to a deleted post hours later just to add a racist redditism?
Yeah, it’s a very common joke which I argue does not work because despite the fact that there is leeway in how words are defined (that’s kind of what my entire comment is about) there is no valid definition of edible which includes mushrooms that definitely kill you if you eat them.
You’d have to use a very strange definition of edible. For something to be edible it does not only need to be able to fit down your throat, it has to be capable of nourishing you without harming you. You can swallow paper and it won’t harm you, but it also can’t nourish you and is thus inedible. You can eat this mushroom and it’ll probably provide some kind of nourishment, but then it will swiftly kill you and thus it is inedible.
I would accept a definition of edible which includes things you can’t digest. For example, gold can also be a food additive referred to by the code E175. Can’t digest it, but it doesn’t hurt you. So I could accept someone referring to gold as edible. But I think the barest, most universal element of something being edible is that it doesn’t kill you. If literal deadly poison is considered edible one must wonder what the word “edible” is even supposed to mean.
Generally games with random elements are considered to be good for dumping tons of hours into. So games with randomly generated worlds like Minecraft, roguelikes, strategy games that are always variant just because of the nature of AI actions always being a little randomized, and other stuff like that. So maybe like Minecraft, Dwarf Fortress, Crusader Kings 2 or 3 as like a basic list. But really the game that’s going to be the most replayable is the one you don’t get tired of. I’ve beaten Thief: The Dark Project hundreds of times and that game is a relatively simple level-based stealth game with no random elements and not even especially huge levels.