141·
11 months agoThe biggest favor you’ve ever done for anyone in your entire life is… Buying a pack of cigarettes?!
LMAO
blaine
- 0 Posts
- 43 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Cake day: June 10th, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Not true in the US. They could ban anyone born in the entire month of April, or anyone who “looks like a pot smoker” if they wanted to.
Applicants, employees and former employees are ONLY protected from employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex (including pregnancy, sexual orientation, or gender identity), national origin, age (40 or older), disability and genetic information (including family medical history).
Is this game still exclusive to Epic?
11·11 months ago@naturalgasbad @voidMainVoid @GiddyGap @aodhsishaj @mycatiskai @coldasblues
Unless you live on the West coast! Maybe we can join up with Canada to become the new superpower?
There was a hearing in the Senate too? I only saw the one in the US House. Does anyone have a link?!
Remember the end of every Mythbusters episode where they went wild trying to see what it would take for the myth to actually be true? Let’s apply that here. What would be the best way to vaporize an entire 30-50g of live resin and get an entire room of people high using household materials?
What if we made a Star Trek movie, but with a smaller 50-100M budget so we can gear it towards existing Star Trek fans instead of hiring JJ Abrams to churn out another generic summer Blockbuster with a thin veneer of Star Trek branding.
In this movie, there will be no violence and the ship won’t even fire its’ weapons. The script will be thought-provoking with a heavy focus on space and science interweaved with humanist philosophy where the crew overcome some sort of moral or ethical dilemma.
In other words… a Star Trek movie, for fans of Star Trek movies, made in the style of the first Star Trek movies.
0·1 year agoI agree that the core claim of the MM report is not under dispute. But take a look at their article now that you know the context around how those ads were generated.
I don’t know if it’s defamatory, but you have to agree that it comes off as a bit disingenuous based on the new info from X. Of course that info from X could be BS, which is why I said we’ll have to wait for the court case to know for sure.
Did you read the article? X is alleging that media matters had to manipulate their platform in order for it to generate these ads next to the hateful accounts. According to their records, those ads only appeared one time, for the user account associated with Media Matters. This supports their theory that manipulation was required.
I guess we’ll have to wait for the court case to find out who’s right. But immediately assuming the X lawsuit has no merits just because you don’t like Elon Musk is a bit disingenuous.
01·1 year agoThereby proving everything the board feared about him. Good riddance.
I think the answer to your question might be subtly embedded in the second paragraph of the article.
“U.S. forces came under attack three times on Sunday evening, including near the Al Omar Oil field… the official told Reuters.”
444·1 year agoThe IDF spokesman in the clip confirmed they were aware of refugee women and children in the location before deciding to go ahead with the bombing.
deleted by creator
This isn’t vandalism. It’s on a page about LGBT slang.
You’ve just described the “Genetic Fallacy”, one of the most common and easy to avoid of the logical fallacies. Remember to always evaluate arguments based on their merits and the facts at hand, rather than the source!
I assume everyone is afraid they’ll lose their jobs and have their social media accounts banned if they post a comment, thereby revealing they engaged with “anti-semitic” media. Guess I’ll go first then.
@auf
@VictimOfAmerikkka
As someone who wasn’t subbed to any of those other communities, I appreciate the cross post! Keep up the good work!