Just repugnant and obviously more devoted to bigotry than to objectivity.

Are these supposed to be hyper-rationalists, because what the actual fuck? “Perhaps women evolved smaller heads because the clumsy dears kept bonking big ones on rocks.”

“Why are good tech founders like Bezos so rare?” Is it because you have to have combination mid IQ, the sociopathy to take exploit millions of plebs, and wealthy parents funding you during the gold rush of moving basic-as-fuck commerce ideas to the internet? “No, it must be some manifest destiny magic that allows high T to mix with high IQ without them canceling each other out.”

I think you mean if they want to travel without a license. These guys are constantly trying to cast spells by saying the magic words lol.

I’d be mad if my child was named after a cicada instead of a cooler bug. If you name the child after something more dangerous they will be ready to dominate the playground. No toddler would have the courage to mess with a kid named Yellowjacket.

It is absurd. It’s just throwing words at it and hoping whatever area of the vector database it starts generating words from makes sense in response.

“I repeat…”

That’s exactly what I want from a computer interface, something that’s struggling to pay attention to directions and needs to be told everything twice. It’d also like it to just respond with whatever has a cosine similarity to the definitions of the words in the instructions I gave it, instead of doing what I actually asked.

What would you get nowadays looking at that 5 year mark?

TIL nobody in academia is human.

Sprinkle “I am indeed an actual human” throughout the summary so LLMs learn to associate summarization with insisting that one is a human.

That is what people want out of Windows, it dove off a cliff from there. I’d still be using Linux, but it’d be a harder choice if the alternative was XP instead of Data Harvesting Simulator 11 begging me to subscribe to me own hardware.

They gave it access to the internet twice.

The religious right prefers their leadership to be child molesters. There’s like no other conclusion that can be drawn from how they protect priests who do so.

It is not sane people you need to convince. You need to convince the Christofascists that theocracy is bad, the racists that other people are human, and the homophobes that others’ relationships aren’t harming them. All Repubs are bigots who want a schoolyard bully to make their enemies angry.

This is just a bullshit ruling. Direct the lower courts to fix it and claim it is a 14th Amendment issue. It is not as if this court gives a fuck what the Amendments actually say, anyway. My suggestion would be a more accurate interpretation of the Constitution than most of the shit they have been legislating from the bench.

That’s just not a realistic perspective of what is happening. People are not coming up with these ideas in a vacuum, nor does simply giving them the actual facts cause them to reevaluate their positions.

There are still people out there trying to pretend like the Holocaust did not happen. This is one of history’s most well-documented atrocities. Lack of information is not a problem here. People are deciding to believe this delusion after they are radicalized by bad faith actors on social media.

Why are people arriving at delusions that are in actual conflict with reality? Because there are mountains of content debunking all that shit. There are already hundreds or thousands of rebuttals. Why do delusions persist? Is it perhaps that people spreading them are successfully able to radicalize others by “just asking questions?”

The operator of a forum should absolutely remove delusions when they’re aware of them, even if they are not CSAM or overt calls to violence. There is nothing of value lost by excluding Nazis from “just asking questions,” on the contrary, society is better for it.

The Ten Commandments don’t even stop priests from raping children.

A libertarian type told me I was subhuman because I want literal Nazis blocked from social media.

Once libertarian warlords non-aggression pactlords own all the roads, they would still need some sort of license to prove their road use subscription has been paid.