Isn’t “it takes two” couch coop?

Ontkennen van klimaat issues? Linkje?

They’re right though. Top of the line software for certain domains (CAD, photoshop) just doesn’t exist for Linux. As much as I would want it to be.

What if they hadn’t? Would manufacturers keep shipping different plugs for anything that’s sold here? Just curious…

These EU funding programs are the original reason I came to Switzerland. It would be good to have this back. Research flourishes by collaboration.

The paper I showed earlier disagrees

I think the use case is not people doing potato study but people that want to lose weight and need to know the amount of calories in the piece of cake that’s offered at the office cafeteria.

It needn’t be exact. A ballpark calorie/sugar that’s 90% accurate would be sufficient. There’s some research that suggests that’s possible: https://arxiv.org/pdf/2011.01082.pdf

Ik vind het maar behoorlijk generaliserend, een hele generatie in een hokje zetten en analyseren vanuit de leunstoel.

Overigens geloof ik niet in het idee dat met eigen acties je klimaatverandering tegen kan gaan ofzo. Dat idee speelt al sinds de jaren negentig “een beter milieu begint bij jezelf”. Wij zijn niet in staat om onze eigen gewoontes structureel tegen de loep te houden, en in plaats daarvan resulteert het in zelfgenoegzaamheid.

No paywall: https://archive.ph/2023.11.12-212740/https://www.ft.com/content/8fde56b7-2515-441a-9472-30c8aedcc200
Tbh, the article doesn’t really talk about the headline. Just some history and talk about Elon musk and Twitter. Not a convincing argument about social media in general.

Because you were replying to this statement by OP:

and as societies get richer in material wealth they produce fewer children and have the luxury to pay attention to things like the environment and their impact on it.

In short your source doesn’t support your claim, but it does story OP’s claim

For crying out loud, Clyde… you need a bunch of science nerds to tell you something this obvious? Fine.

Lol, very first sentence in that source:

Three mechanisms influence the fertility decision of educated women: (1) the relatively higher incomes and thus higher income forgone due to childbearing leads them to want fewer children. […]

Sci-fi is fictional, Clyde - not prophecy.

They’re just referring to the fact that the universe we live in is no “finite system” per the meme

Riiight… that’s why we’re the most destructive agent on the planet since the meteor that killed off the dinosaurs - because we “do more with less.” Wtf?

Yes exactly! They’re not saying that’s a good thing but that’s exactly why!

Which societies, Clyde? The ones that capitalism has impoverished so that a small minority can pretend their privileged lives are (somehow) “normal?”

Regardless if the distribution of that wealth is acceptable, growth has made the overall society richer in material wealth. The distribution of that wealth is an entirely different question.

And that’s a good thing, is it? You know we could just achieve that easily by giving women reproductive rights, don’t you? As in… no capitalism required at all?

You have any proof for that statement?

Adding to this, “limitless” growth just refers to the idea that it’s very hard to reach all limits in our present universe.

I agree that there are more important problems with capitalism than if we’ve reached a limit or not.

Yes

Not saying I agree or disagree with the author. However you being his wife did not result in “female-initiated disruption of a male hierarchy” (their words) so it’s not really an argument against their hypothesis.

(Of course your husband being nice and not a dickhead probably also plays a role)

Meeting the work wife: https://youtu.be/FoM_q4h7cAQ

What are you talking about?

Nice! The first design is always a big step!

Are you having space for magnets in there?

If you’d like I’d suggest to put the files in printables.com, that way everyone can profit and remix your designs!

Dit was een interessante goed onderzochte video. Hij laat mooi de beide kanten zien. Ik wist trouwens niet dat het woord “zesjescultuur” nog steeds rond ging, dat kwam nog van Balkenende geloof ik.

Focussen op leren ipv cijfers lijkt me een goed ding. In mijn ervaring op de unief leek het dat het meestal de mensen die geïnteresseerd waren in het onderwerp die er het meeste van opstaken. Dat zorgde natuurlijk ook voor hogere cijfers. Maar mensen die enkel om de cijfers gingen waren minder mee en meer gestressed (geneeskunde studenten in dit geval).

Kleine toevoeging, als het over happiness of success gaat van het land is het altijd de vraag of het “daardoor” of “ondanks” is (because or despite).