De Nederlandse tegenhanger is volgens mij om vroege checks op basis van risicoprofielen te doen. Dus iemand met huidkanker in de familie wordt daar jaarlijks op gecontroleerd, mannen worden vanaf een bepaalde leeftijd gescreend op prostaatkanker, etc. In plaats van maar op alles (of beter gezegd, de generieke hoog-risico-ziektes) te checken. Goedkoper, en net zo effectief, als niet effectiever. Maar dan natuurlijk beschikbaar voor iedereen.

Media URL Timestamper - automatically inserts the current timestamp of the YouTube/Twitch video you’re watching and updates it in the history in case you accidentally close/navigate away from the page or go to a different time in the video

Ooh, that’s clever! I usually don’t get many new extensions out of threads like these, but this is neat, thanks for sharing!

I imagine part of the reason is that uBOL’s target audience might have less of a problem with not getting it via AMO? After all, it probably wouldn’t even exist if Chrome didn’t pull its MV3 shenanigans.

Appears to be a mistake, but needs gorhill to appeal to make the reviewer aware of the mistake and to be able to fix it, which he doesn’t feel like doing because he thinks it’s unlikely to have been a mistake.

Update: now reversed, but gorhill removed it himself just to not have to deal with the review process and the possibility of human error anymore.

And they’re cornering several markets, e.g. also the browser markets, which if we let them will make your adblocker no longer work either.

Don’t use Chrome or Chrome-based browsers people. (So basically, use Firefox.)

(Yes there are a couple of others too. Do what you want, I’m not your boss.)

https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/Why-don’t-you-accept-donations%3F

De deur van de WC helemaal dicht doen, blijkbaar.

In my defense, letterlijk elke andere deur in ons huis gaat niet helemaal dicht, dus ik ben gewend ze niet helemaal dicht te duwen. Maar hoewel ik er steeds vaker aan denk, blijft het een ergernisje hier :P

Yeah I was just elaborating on your point.

It’s conspiratorial that Google gets ad clicks through Firefox, and pays Mozilla some of the money it makes from that?

And I suppose it’s also conspiratorial to claim it’s doing the same for Safari users - instead it’s more likely that it’s paying Apple 20 billion a year to remain out of the clutches of regulators?

Imagine if all the hours spent shitposting on Lemmy was spent on a single distribution.

The ways people enjoy spending their time are not interchangeable. Or in other words: https://fosstodon.org/@bragefuglseth/113183569977642462

I mean, the extension system means we could easily fix it

If that’s the case, then why not do it? Apparently the people who actually worked on X11 had a different idea, and so they decide not to do it themselves - but the code is right there for those who do think that that’s a good approach.

Likewise, there are plenty of definitions of “better” that make Wayland a lot better. It’s just that it’s a lot of work to make something better, especially for some interpretations of “better”.

The authentic French translation of forking.

And where did that Google money come from?

(It’s a rhetorical question of course: it came from Firefox users clicking on ads.)

How do you think Mozilla was funded before Fakespot and Anonym were acquired?

Thanks!

Pullout game? I don’t pull out, I just rawdog that sex!

Wait.

It’s a real shame the process for the previous logo wasn’t followed again. I liked the previous logo, too.

Oh damn, jouw gezin heeft echt niet de loterij gewonnen he…

Maar zeker, als je merkt hoe lang het duurde voor de enorme misstanden in de gesloten jeugdinrichtingen in het nieuws kwamen (en ik denk dat dat nog steeds niet is opgelost), dan verbaast het me niets dat er nog veel meer niet in het nieuws is.

18 years of it.