I’m gonna guess Trump would respond with:
A) “Fake News”
B) “A lot of people are saying they aren’t Chinese”
C) “Ukraine shouldn’t have started the war. China is just helping an ally.”
D) Not comment on it at all and say/do something attention grabbing to distract.
I don’t think he really cares about China. I think he’s just sabotaging the US for Putin.
This is an oversimplification that ignores nuance.
It’s like saying “everyone dies one day, so whatever symptoms you are experiencing automatically mean you are dying now”.
This is all part of the natural life cycle of empires. Best case scenario is they fizzle out with protection from another empire, like Great Britain did. Worst case scenario is really bad.
You’re saying Russia is invading Ukraine and China is getting ready to invade Taiwan because the US has less control because of decadence?
This is all part of the natural life cycle of empires. Best case scenario is they fizzle out with protection from another empire, like Great Britain did. Worst case scenario is really bad.
This isn’t even the first time in US history that they’ve become isolationist.
It looks like all the Russian agents (Republicans) are trying to spoil US relations with Europe. Why would Putin want them to do that?
Why do Democrats talk like they can win elections but then blame voters when they lose?
Because they’ve won the majority of elections in the last 3 decades. They arent blaming voters when they lose. The voters that voted democrat are blaming leftists for not voting and getting Trump elected.
And to be honest, I don’t really even follow your post. Are Democrats not progressives? Are we agreeing that they are center right and that their base isn’t really motivated to vote for that?
Democrats have been moving left since Obama. Leftist didn’t show up to vote this elections because of Gaza so they got Trump elected. So now democrats need to cater to the right to increase voter turnout.
Why is it that progressives consistently lose elections but talk like they know how to win elections?
If progressives know how to win better than democrats why do they keep losing elections?
We are in an echo chamber. Downvotes on lemmy do not reflect a real world consensus on opinions.
Literally anyone can run in a closed primary. A closed primary means that only registered members of the party can vote in the primary.
Winning the primary decides whether or not someone can run as a candidate in the general election. Either you need that explained because you don’t know anything about primaries or you are pretending to not understand what you’re reading.
There are only 15 states that hold closed primaries. I live in a state with open primaries, and I’m repped by Ed Markey, Elizabeth Warren, and Ayanna Pressley. Not exactly a bunch of secret conservatives, is it?
Your reading comprehension is failing you again. Having no vetting process doesn’t guarentee the candidate is a “secret conservative” it just increases the chances of it happening. I’m surprised I need to explain that again.
It isn’t. Sit down, you don’t know what you’re talking about.
It’s literally the definition of what they are doing with closed primaries. Why does that need to be explained to you?
And giving people the choice between center right and far-right doesn’t motivate voters.
That choice was made by the voters.
LOL, how do you think letting anyone run as a candidate without vetting them will turn out?
Absolutely any bad actor will be able to run without intervention. The floodgates would be open. Which is probably what the bad actors calling for open primaries want.
Also, closed primaries don’t add any more vetting. They just mean that the only people who get to vote in the primaries are party members.
This is the definition of vetting. lol
Nah, they just cater to their corporate donors and folks that would never vote for them.
Because of Citizens United, this is a necessary evil. You either get donors or you lose from lack of funding.
Look at the progressives that lost recently because AIPAC out funded their competition.
Voters had to chose between two candidates, one on the left and one on the right. Voters chose the one on the right. Meaning not enough leftist showed up to vote.
Leftist don’t show up to vote > voters chose the option furthest right > leftists learn nothing, blame democrats and do it again next cycle.
This is why leftist keep losing elections and their legislation doesn’t get passed. They refuse to work with other ideologies and they don’t have enough voters to accomplish anything alone.
Democratic Party is made up of people the voters chose. Many of whom are moderate.
If leftists can’t get enough voters to change that, it won’t change.
Politicians don’t cater to groups that don’t vote.
They need to start poking bears. Use the laws even if outnumbered. Show force; show pressure.
These words mean nothing. They are not a strategy or a plan or even coherent.
You’re avoiding the fact that in a democracy, you need enough votes to make things happen.
Tell us what is happening. Get the word out. We can’t help if all we hear is what has happened.
We know what’s happening. That’s why we are having this conversation.
The rules have changed and democrats are still using a textbook from 1990.
What rules have changed? Republicans are breaking the rules by performing a coup. To even imply that democrats should do the same thing as republicans shows you’re arguing in bad faith.
And how will removing the vetting process impact the amount of candidates we get like Fetterman? It will increase them.
The primaries are where the party platform is shifted. It’s how the Republicans got first the Tea Party and then MAGA.
Which is why we need the DNC to vet candidates as much as possible. So we don’t end up getting some democrat version of Trump through open primaries.
If you don’t have enough elected officials to do anything then criticism is pointless.
Criticism is for when there is no threat to your ability to get elected.
Criticism before an election is secured, gives the opposition talking points to use against you. It also gives voters a reason to feel apathetic and not vote.
This guarantees leftist legislation doesn’t get passed and leftists politicians don’t get elected.
Involved in what way?
What do you mean by “only do politics on Election Day”
FUD works by sowing apathy to discourage a behavior. In this scenario, all that criticism is used by bad actors to convince people who would vote democrat to just stay home or believe that voting doesn’t matter because bother sides are the same.
Leftists fuel the anti-democratic propaganda machines with their ‘criticism’. Those ‘criticisms’ have consequences and in the end, prevent leftists legislation from being passed.
Did leftists stay home during the election and hand over the US to fascists because of spongebobcase?
Trump has already been impeached multiple times. One more isn’t going to change your reaction.